Skip to main content

Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
charter-ietf-behave-06

The information below is for an older approved charter
Document Charter Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance WG (behave) Snapshot
Title Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
Last updated 2004-09-27
State Approved
WG State Concluded
IESG Responsible AD Spencer Dawkins
Charter edit AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

charter-ietf-behave-06

The working group creates documents to enable NATs to function in as
deterministic a fashion as possible.

To support deployments where communicating hosts require using different
address families (IPv4 or IPv6), address family translation is
needed to establish communication. In BEHAVE's specification work on
this topic it will coordinate with the V6ops WG on requirements and
operational considerations.

"An IPv4 network" or "an IPv6 network" in the descriptions below refer
to a network with a clearly identifiable administrative domain (e.g., an
enterprise campus network, a mobile operator's cellular network, a
residential subscriber network, etc.). It will also be that network that
deploys the necessary equipment for translation.

BEHAVE will adopt additional work items to finish four scenarios:
An IPv6 network to IPv4 Internet, IPv6 Internet to an IPv4 network,
An IPv6 network to an IPv4 network, and An IPv4 network to an
IPv6 network. These additional work items include suggestions to
application developers to improve application interactions with
those translation scenarios.

The following scenario remains in scope for discussion, and new
milestones can be created to address this scenario:

  • An IPv4 application running on an IPv6-only connected host to the
    IPv6 Internet, i.e. perform translation between IPv4 and IPv6 for
    packets in uni- or bi-directional flows that are initiated from an
    IPv4 host towards an IPv6 host. The translator function is embedded
    in the IPv4 host.

The following scenarios remain in scope for discussion, but creating
new milestones will require re-chartering:

  • An IPv4 network to IPv6 Internet, i.e. perform translation between
    IPv4 and IPv6 for packets in uni- or bi-directional flows that are
    initiated from an IPv4 host towards an IPv6 host. The translator
    function is intended to service a specific IPv4 network using either
    public or private IPv4 address space.

  • IPv4 Internet to an IPv6 network, i.e. perform translation between
    IPv4 and IPv6 for packets in uni- or bi-directional flows that are
    initiated from an IPv4 host towards an IPv6 host. The translator
    function is intended to service a specific IPv6 network where selected
    IPv6 hosts and services are to be reachable.

  • multicast translation, including control traffic (IGMP and MLD),
    Single Source Multicast (SSM) and Any Source Multicast (ASM).

All translation solutions shall be capable of handling flows using TCP,
UDP, DCCP, and SCTP, unless they prevent a timely completion of the work
item. The parts of ICMP that can be translated are also required to work
across a translation solution. Additional protocols directly on top of
IP may be supported. Translation mechanisms must handle IP
fragmentation.

Translation mechanisms cannot transparently support protocols that embed
network addresses within their protocol messages without application
level gateways (ALGs). Because ALGs have security issues (like blocking
usage of TLS), are error prone and brittle, and hinder application
development, the usage of ALGs in the defined translators should be
avoided. Instead application developers will need to be aware and use
mechanisms that handle the address family translation. ALGs may be
considered only for the most crucial of legacy applications.

Solutions may solve more than one of the cases, however timely delivery
is more important than a unified solution.