Ballot for charter-ietf-cose
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Thanks for addressing my comments. Just preserving a part of that below as it may be of use to other ADs in their evaluations. I was initially skeptical of this work, doubting that there is really sufficient real interest in CBOR to justify spending the time on a WG. However, (just about) enough people argued that they would or are using CBOR to convince me that there could well be a real constituency here. And given that, I'd prefer the work be done in the IETF rather than ad-hoc and possibly by some folks who'd prioritise constrained-system requirements too much over security and privacy requirements. So in the end, I'm for doing this.
Thanks for addressing my previous comment.