Skip to main content

Diameter Maintenance and Extensions
charter-ietf-dime-07

Yes


No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2012-08-15 for -06) Unknown
I don't think this needs to go to external review, and would be happy with just approving this change to the charter.

(But I might suggest moving the new bulleted item above the previous paragraph so it's with the other bulleted items)
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-08-16 for -06-00) Unknown
Fine with this.
Can you look at formatting, however. I think the paragraph that starts "Additionally..." is supposed to be hanging.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-08-16 for -06-00) Unknown
Them charter text is Ok, I just wonder about the milestones, as the ' Diameter Overload Control Requirements' are going for Standards Track RFC. 

Shouldn't they go for Informational?
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-08-15 for -06-00) Unknown
I don't think external review is needed.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06-00) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06-00) Unknown