IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
charter-ietf-ipsecme-13
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-23
|
13 | Amy Vezza | Responsible AD changed to Roman Danyliw from Benjamin Kaduk |
2020-01-10
|
13 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-13.txt |
2020-01-10
|
12-01 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) |
2020-01-10
|
12-01 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2020-01-10
|
12-01 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2020-01-10
|
12-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2020-01-09
|
12-01 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2020-01-08
|
12-01 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2020-01-08
|
12-01 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2020-01-08
|
12-01 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2020-01-08
|
12-01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2020-01-08
|
12-01 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2020-01-07
|
12-01 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2020-01-07
|
12-01 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2020-01-07
|
12-01 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2020-01-06
|
12-01 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2020-01-03
|
12-01 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | Telechat date has been changed to 2020-01-09 from 2019-12-19 |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | Created "Approve" ballot |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal IESG/IAB Review) |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | WG new work message text was changed |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | WG review text was changed |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | WG review text was changed |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Amy Vezza | WG review text was changed |
2019-12-20
|
12-01 | Benjamin Kaduk | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-12-01.txt |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "Signature algorithm negotiation for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to June 2021 from March 2019 |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "The ESP on contrained network to IESG", set due date to June 2021 from December 2018 |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "The security labels support for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to August 2020 from January 2019, added draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec to milestone |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to May 2020 from May 2019, reverted to not being resolved, added … Changed charter milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to May 2020 from May 2019, reverted to not being resolved, added draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2 to milestone |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "G-DOI for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to May 2020 from December 2018, added draft-yeung-g-ikev2 to milestone |
2019-12-20
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "The internal address failure indication in IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to December 2019 from October 2018, added draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes to milestone |
2019-12-19
|
12-00 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2019-12-19
|
12-00 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund |
2019-12-19
|
12-00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2019-12-19
|
12-00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot comment] While I have no objection to the charter, I would suggest to coordinate to compressed ESP/IKEv2 of this charter with the compression work … [Ballot comment] While I have no objection to the charter, I would suggest to coordinate to compressed ESP/IKEv2 of this charter with the compression work done in LPWAN (mainly or only for the non-encrypted parts). |
2019-12-19
|
12-00 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
2019-12-18
|
12-00 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2019-12-16
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2019-12-16
|
12-00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2019-12-16
|
12-00 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2019-12-15
|
12-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot comment] Some wordsmithing on the two new paragraphs, mostly correcting grammar errors and awkward wording: NEW RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies how to … [Ballot comment] Some wordsmithing on the two new paragraphs, mostly correcting grammar errors and awkward wording: NEW RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies how to encapsulate IKEv2 and ESP traffic in TCP. Implementation experience has revealed that not all situations are covered in RFC8229, and that may lead to interoperability problems or to suboptimal performance. The WG will provide a document to give implementors more guidance about how to use reliable stream transport in IKEv2 and clarify some issues that have been discovered. A possible starting point is draft-smyslov-ipsecme-tcp-guidelines. The demand for Traffic Flow Confidentiality has been increasing in the user community, but the current method defined in RFC4303 (adding null padding to each ESP payload) is very inefficient in its use of network resources. The working group will develop an alternative TFC solution that uses network resources more efficiently. END |
2019-12-15
|
12-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2019-12-12
|
12-00 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2019-12-12
|
12-00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2019-12-11
|
12-00 | Amy Vezza | Telechat date has been changed to 2019-12-19 from 2018-09-13 |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | WG action text was changed |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | WG review text was changed |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | WG review text was changed |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | State changed to Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal IESG/IAB Review) from Draft Charter |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added charter milestone "Traffic Flow Confidentiality document to IESG", due November 2020 |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added charter milestone "TCP-encapsulation guidelines document to IESG", due August 2020 |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Changed charter milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", resolved as "Done" |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", due May 2019, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "Signature algorithm negotiation for IKEv2 to IESG", due March 2019, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "The security labels support for IKEv2 to IESG", due January 2019, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "G-DOI for IKEv2 to IESG", due December 2018, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "The ESP on contrained network to IESG", due December 2018, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | Added milestone "The internal address failure indication in IKEv2 to IESG", due October 2018, from current group milestones |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | State changed to Draft Charter from Approved |
2019-12-10
|
12-00 | Benjamin Kaduk | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-12-00.txt |
2019-03-27
|
12 | Cindy Morgan | Responsible AD changed to Benjamin Kaduk from Eric Rescorla |
2018-09-17
|
12 | Amy Vezza | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-12.txt |
2018-09-17
|
11-06 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved from External review |
2018-09-17
|
11-06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the charter |
2018-09-17
|
11-06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2018-09-17
|
11-06 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2018-09-17
|
11-06 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2018-09-13
|
11-06 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-06.txt |
2018-09-13
|
11-05 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2018-09-13
|
11-05 | Ignas Bagdonas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ignas Bagdonas |
2018-09-13
|
11-05 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot comment] Very clear charter with well defined goals. nice work! one nit: s/public keys then/public keys than/ I would have appreciated to read the … [Ballot comment] Very clear charter with well defined goals. nice work! one nit: s/public keys then/public keys than/ I would have appreciated to read the expansion of ESP and IV but I can understand this is not needed for subject matter experts. |
2018-09-13
|
11-05 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2018-09-12
|
11-05 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot comment] One could perhaps argue for "similar or better" quantum resistant properties as opposed to just "similar" ones. |
2018-09-12
|
11-05 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2018-09-12
|
11-05 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-09-12
|
11-05 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2018-09-12
|
11-05 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2018-09-11
|
11-05 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-09-11
|
11-05 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] Minor punctuation comment for the paragraph starting with "RFC7427": OLD: "A prominent example is RSASSA-PKCS#1 v 1.5 and RSASSA-PSS, however it is envisioned..." … [Ballot comment] Minor punctuation comment for the paragraph starting with "RFC7427": OLD: "A prominent example is RSASSA-PKCS#1 v 1.5 and RSASSA-PSS, however it is envisioned..." NEW: "A prominent example is RSASSA-PKCS#1 v 1.5 and RSASSA-PSS; however, it is envisioned..." |
2018-09-11
|
11-05 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2018-09-11
|
11-05 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-09-11
|
11-05 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla |
2018-09-10
|
11-05 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-09-10
|
11-05 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2018-09-10
|
11-05 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] If TSV can help with the work on Postquantum key exchange methods and the impact of increased size of initial IKEv2 messages, please … [Ballot comment] If TSV can help with the work on Postquantum key exchange methods and the impact of increased size of initial IKEv2 messages, please let us know. I note that https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-04#section-6 is part of a current TSVWG work item, and this might be relevant to that discussion, but that's only my poorly informed opinion. But we may be able to help in other ways. |
2018-09-10
|
11-05 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2018-09-13 from 2018-06-07 |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Cindy Morgan | WG new work message text was changed |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Eric Rescorla | Created "Approve" ballot |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Eric Rescorla | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Eric Rescorla | State changed to External review from Internal review |
2018-08-27
|
11-05 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-05.txt |
2018-07-18
|
11-04 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-04.txt |
2018-07-18
|
11-03 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-03.txt |
2018-07-16
|
11-02 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-02.txt |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Ignas Bagdonas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ignas Bagdonas |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot comment] Lots of good points made already that I won't repeat. |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2018-06-07
|
11-01 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot comment] For the "The internal address failure indication in IKEv2" item it might be good to talk to 3GPP since they seem to be … [Ballot comment] For the "The internal address failure indication in IKEv2" item it might be good to talk to 3GPP since they seem to be the only potential consumer of this work. |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot comment] Just to hammer on: the use of an expiration date on the charter for this WG has already proven not useful -- as … [Ballot comment] Just to hammer on: the use of an expiration date on the charter for this WG has already proven not useful -- as we are already 6 months past the last expiration date and the WG was not closed. |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot comment] I agree that I don’t see value in having the expiration date. Why does the working group feel this is needed? s/IPsec SA. … [Ballot comment] I agree that I don’t see value in having the expiration date. Why does the working group feel this is needed? s/IPsec SA. non-standard/IPsec SA. Non-standard/ |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] I agree with Alissa's substantive and editorial comments. |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot comment] Substantive comments: (1) I don't see the value in having an expiration date in a WG charter because it's not enforced in practice. … [Ballot comment] Substantive comments: (1) I don't see the value in having an expiration date in a WG charter because it's not enforced in practice. The previous version of this charter said the WG would close if the charter wasn't updated by Dec 2017, but the WG continued to exist without the charter being updated. This charter seems tightly scoped enough to just get the work done according to the milestone dates or close sooner if people lose interest. (2) I think it might be worth a few words to state the reason why the goal was for the new IKEv2 mode to have the same quantum resistant properties as existed in IKEv1, rather than better/fuller quantum resistance. Nits: Based on the number of grammar and wording errors I found in this charter, I would strongly suggest doing a clean-up pass to make sure all of the text reads properly. Here is what I found: (1) s/to have similar quantum resistant properties than IKEv1 had/to have similar quantum resistant properties that IKEv1 had/ (2) s/in form of counter/in the form of a counter/ (3) I can't parse this sentence: "A growing number of use cases for constrained network - but not limited to - have shown interest in reducing ESP (resp. IKEv2) overhead by compressing ESP (resp IKEv2) fields." (4) OLD Currently IKE peers have no explicit way to indicate each other which signature format(s) the support, that leads to ineroperability problems. NEW Currently IKE peers have no explicit way to indicate to each other which signature format(s) they support. That leads to ineroperability problems. (5) The milestones need to be updated. Some of the dates and draft names are wrong. |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2018-06-06
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Eric Rescorla |
2018-06-02
|
11-01 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-06-01
|
11-01 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] I don't object to this proposed charter going for internal review, but do have one question. When looking at some of the work … [Ballot comment] I don't object to this proposed charter going for internal review, but do have one question. When looking at some of the work items, I see "A possible starting point is draft-yeung-g-ikev2" (nit, missing closing period) "draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp and draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension are expected to be good starting points for ESP compression." "draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compression and raft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compact are good starting point for IKEv2 compression." (nit, should be "starting points") "draft-boucadair-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes could be used as a starting point for this item." If you're using different language to convey a nuance, that would be fine (I'm missing it, but I miss things). If you're saying the same thing in all four cases, I'd suggest using the same phrasing in each case. so working group chairs and participants aren't trying to figure out whether "possible starting point" and "could be used as a starting point" are the same as "expected to be good starting points" and "are good starting points". I think I see "A possible starting point is" in most charters that point to individual drafts, which lets the working group decide whether to adopt that proposal or work on a different approach, but do the right thing, of course. |
2018-06-01
|
11-01 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2018-06-07 from 2016-09-15 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Cindy Morgan | Responsible AD changed to Eric Rescorla from Kathleen Moriarty |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | WG action text was changed |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | WG review text was changed |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | WG review text was changed |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Changed charter milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to May 2019 from May 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Changed charter milestone "The security labels support for IKEv2 to IESG", set due date to January 2019 from January 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "Signature algorithm negotiation for IKEv2 to IESG", due March 2019 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "G-DOI for IKEv2 to IESG", due December 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "The ESP on contrained network to IESG", due December 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "The internal address failure indication in IKEv2 to IESG", due October 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "Postquantum cryptography document for IKEv2 to IESG", due May 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added charter milestone "The security labels support for IKEv2 to IESG", due January 2018 |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on partially quantum resistant IKEv2", due May 2018, from current group milestones |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Implicit IV in IPsec", due April 2018, from current group milestones |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Split-DNS Configuration for IKEv2", due April 2018, from current group milestones |
2018-05-29
|
11-01 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-01.txt |
2018-03-28
|
11-00 | Eric Rescorla | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2018-03-28
|
11-00 | Eric Rescorla | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11-00.txt |
2016-09-16
|
11 | Amy Vezza | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-11.txt |
2016-09-16
|
11 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved from External review |
2016-09-16
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the charter |
2016-09-16
|
11 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2016-09-16
|
11 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on partially quantum resistant IKEv2", due June 2017, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Implicit IV in IPsec", due February 2017, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Split-DNS Configuration for IKEv2", due February 2017, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Using EdDSA in the IKEv2", due January 2017, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec", due December 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for ESP / AH", due November 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2", due November 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2", due October 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection", due October 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2" |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2" |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection" |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2", due November 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2", due October 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection", due October 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2" |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2" |
2016-09-16
|
10-02 | Amy Vezza | Deleted milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection" |
2016-09-15
|
10-02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2016-09-15
|
10-02 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2016-09-15
|
10-02 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2016-09-15
|
10-02 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2016-09-15
|
10-02 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] The milestones are all in the past. Should 2016 be 2017? Also, I notice the milestone list does not cover the full set … [Ballot comment] The milestones are all in the past. Should 2016 be 2017? Also, I notice the milestone list does not cover the full set of current goals--is that the intent? (I'm okay if it is; just checking.) |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Ben Campbell | Ballot comment text updated for Ben Campbell |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] The milestones are all in the past. Should 2016 be 2017? Also, I notice the milestone list does not cover the full set … [Ballot comment] The milestones are all in the past. Should 2016 be 2017? Also, I notice the milestone list does not cover the full set of goals--is that the intent? (I'm okay if it is; just checking.) |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] Not for IPSECME, but for the IESG ... I don't object to this work: "There have been middle boxes blocking IKE negotiation over … [Ballot comment] Not for IPSECME, but for the IESG ... I don't object to this work: "There have been middle boxes blocking IKE negotiation over UDP. To make IKE work in these environments, IKE and ESP packets need to be transmitted over TCP. Therefore the group will define a mechanism to use IKE and IPsec over TCP. The group will also provide guidance on how to detect when IKE cannot be negotiated over UDP, and TCP should be used as a fallback" because what's described is going from UDP to TCP, which avoids a lot of challenges that going from TCP to UDP gives you, but it would be good for us to talk about all the ways that people are detecting poor performance, and even complete failures, in one protocol and switching to another protocol in response. I note that Ian Swett reported in Berlin that Google sees QUIC affected by UDP impairments, including blocking, about five percent of the time, and they also fall back to TCP, so this is a current problem affecting work in multiple areas. Perhaps this is a a good topic for an upcoming informal telechat. |
2016-09-14
|
10-02 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2016-09-15 from 2016-09-01 |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG new work message text was changed |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Approve" ballot |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to External review from Internal review |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2", due March 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on cryptographic algorithms for IKEv2", due March 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-02
|
10-02 | Cindy Morgan | Added milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection", due March 2016, from current group milestones |
2016-09-01
|
10-02 | Kathleen Moriarty | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-02.txt |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot comment] Thanks for changing the text on TCP! |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mirja Kühlewind has been changed to No Objection from Block |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Please provide some milestones along with dates, as guidance so that all documents are finished by Dec 2017. Otherwise this text below becomes … [Ballot comment] Please provide some milestones along with dates, as guidance so that all documents are finished by Dec 2017. Otherwise this text below becomes a blanket statement, not paid attention to. This charter will expire in December 2017. If the charter is not updated before that time, the WG will be closed and any remaining documents revert back to individual Internet-Drafts. Hint: the current charter says This charter will expire in December 2015 (a year from approval). If the charter is not updated before that time, the WG will be closed and any remaining documents revert back to individual Internet-Drafts. |
2016-09-01
|
10-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2016-08-31
|
10-01 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2016-08-31
|
10-01 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2016-08-31
|
10-01 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] I share Alissa's concern about the number of documents for the time window. |
2016-08-31
|
10-01 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2016-08-31
|
10-01 | Kathleen Moriarty | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-01.txt |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot comment] I find the last paragraph artificial and unnecessary: This charter will expire in December 2017. If the charter is not updated … [Ballot comment] I find the last paragraph artificial and unnecessary: This charter will expire in December 2017. If the charter is not updated before that time, the WG will be closed and any remaining documents revert back to individual Internet-Drafts. I understand that this type of text in a charter may help the WG maintain momentum, so I'm not going to stand in the way of making progress. |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot comment] This seems like a lot of documents for a 16-month window based on this group's past publication rate. Good to be ambitious, but … [Ballot comment] This seems like a lot of documents for a 16-month window based on this group's past publication rate. Good to be ambitious, but I'm just wondering how realistic this is. |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot block] Similar to Spencer's commet I have problems understanding what the following really means: "To make IKE work in these environments, IKE packets need … [Ballot block] Similar to Spencer's commet I have problems understanding what the following really means: "To make IKE work in these environments, IKE packets need to be encapsulated in a TCP tunnel. The group will define a mechanism to tunnel IKE and IPsec over a TCP-based connection. This method is intended to be used as a fallback when IKE cannot be negotiated over UDP. The group will create a method where IKEv2 and IPsec packets can be encapsulated in the TCP connection." Based on Tero's mail I understand how the stack looks like but that's not clear from the text because there is not really anything like a TCP tunnel. So the big question is, based on the stack indicated by Tero, do you have two full TCP connections running with two congestion control loops and retransmission mechanisms on two different endpoints? That's nothing I would recommend. I fully understand the need for a fallback mechanism to TCP but depending on what you actually aim for I'm not sure if this is the right wg for it; therefore my block for now. I hope we can resolve that quickly! |
2016-08-31
|
10-00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Block, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2016-08-30
|
10-00 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2016-08-30
|
10-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] There are some typos (s/MIT/MTI) and bits of English that need to be tidied up. I have a suggestion about this bit of … [Ballot comment] There are some typos (s/MIT/MTI) and bits of English that need to be tidied up. I have a suggestion about this bit of work: "IKEv1 using shared secret authentication was partially resistance to quantum computers. IKEv2 removed this feature to make the protocol more usable. The working group will add a mode to IKEv2 or otherwise modify IKEv2 to have similar quantum resistant properties than IKEv1 had." My suggestion is twofold: 1) - s/will add/will consider adding/ and to add to the end: 2) "In doing this work the WG will consider ongoing work on quantum-resistance in the CFRG, and whether it is better to re-instate the same level of resistance that was present in IKEv1 or to wait for more recent work (e.g. in CFRG) to mature." The reason I suggest this is that it's possible the WG might conclude that it's better to wait for some newer QR stuff from CFRG. The current wording seems to commit the WG to firing ahead anyway, and we might overall be better if there are fewer QR mechanisms proposed, rather than adding some now when it might be better to wait a while longer. |
2016-08-30
|
10-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2016-08-29
|
10-00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] This sentence doesn't parse for me - or maybe I just need more security clue? "IKEv1 using shared secret authentication was partially resistance … [Ballot comment] This sentence doesn't parse for me - or maybe I just need more security clue? "IKEv1 using shared secret authentication was partially resistance to quantum computers." I don't object to this text "There have been middle boxes blocking IKE negotiation over UDP. To make IKE work in these environments, IKE packets need to be encapsulated in a TCP tunnel. The group will define a mechanism to tunnel IKE and IPsec over a TCP-based connection. This method is intended to be used as a fallback when IKE cannot be negotiated over UDP. The group will create a method where IKEv2 and IPsec packets can be encapsulated in the TCP connection." going for external review, but I'd love to understand better what the resulting protocol stack looks like. I get the part about encapsulating IKEv2 in TCP, but is encapsulating IPsec in TCP going to give us a general-purpose "IP over TCP" mechanism? |
2016-08-29
|
10-00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Telechat date has been changed to 2016-09-01 from 2015-01-08 |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | WG action text was changed |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | WG review text was changed |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | WG review text was changed |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | The WG adopted several new drafts that required a charter update as the charter is maintained to current work items and a time limit is … The WG adopted several new drafts that required a charter update as the charter is maintained to current work items and a time limit is set for them to complete those milestones by the WG (their choice to keep the energy up or close if there isn't enough to support getting the work done). |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2016-08-25
|
10-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00.txt |
2016-08-25
|
10 | Kathleen Moriarty | Notification list changed to ipsecme-chairs@tools.ietf.org from "Yaron Sheffer" <yaronf@gmx.com> |
2015-10-14
|
10 | (System) | Notify list changed from "Yaron Sheffer" , "Paul E. Hoffman" , ipsec@ietf.org to "Yaron Sheffer" |
2015-01-09
|
10 | Amy Vezza | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-10.txt |
2015-01-09
|
09-01 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved from Internal review |
2015-01-09
|
09-01 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the charter |
2015-01-09
|
09-01 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2015-01-09
|
09-01 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2015-01-09
|
09-01 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2015-01-08
|
09-01 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2015-01-08
|
09-01 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2015-01-07
|
09-01 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot comment] Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to figure out of IPSEC can work for OE. Should you be captured, the … [Ballot comment] Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to figure out of IPSEC can work for OE. Should you be captured, the secretary will disavow all knowledge of your actions. This working group will self-destruct in five seconds. |
2015-01-07
|
09-01 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2015-01-07
|
09-01 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2015-01-07
|
09-01 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2015-01-06
|
09-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] This charter will expire in December 2015 (a year from approval). If the charter is not updated before that time, the WG will … [Ballot comment] This charter will expire in December 2015 (a year from approval). If the charter is not updated before that time, the WG will be closed and any remaining documents revert back to individual Internet-Drafts. I like this "fail fast" type of paragraph. |
2015-01-06
|
09-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2015-01-06
|
09-01 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2015-01-05
|
09-01 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot comment] I do find these "This charter will expire" lines kind of silly, but I'm not going to stand in the way because of … [Ballot comment] I do find these "This charter will expire" lines kind of silly, but I'm not going to stand in the way because of it. |
2015-01-05
|
09-01 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2015-01-05
|
09-01 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2015-01-03
|
09-01 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2015-01-03
|
09-01 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2015-01-03
|
09-01 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2015-01-02
|
09-01 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2015-01-02
|
09-01 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2015-01-02
|
09-01 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-12-31
|
09-01 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2015-01-08 from 2013-01-10 |
2014-12-31
|
09-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2014-12-31
|
09-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2014-12-31
|
09-01 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2014-12-31
|
09-01 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2014-12-23
|
09-01 | Kathleen Moriarty | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-09-01.txt |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Notification list changed to "Yaron Sheffer" <yaronf@gmx.com>, "Paul E. Hoffman" <phoffman@proper.com>, ipsec@ietf.org |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Added charter milestone "IETF Last Call on null authentication", due December 2015 |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Added charter milestone "IETF Last Call on DDoS protection", due August 2015 |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Added charter milestone "IETF last call on new mandatory-to-implement algorithms", due January 2014 |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Added charter milestone "IETF last call on IKE fragmentation solution", due January 2014 |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | Added charter milestone "IETF Last Call on large scale VPN use cases and requirements", due January 2014 |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2014-10-31
|
09-00 | Kathleen Moriarty | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-09-00.txt |
2014-10-31
|
09 | Kathleen Moriarty | Responsible AD changed to Kathleen Moriarty from Sean Turner |
2013-01-15
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-09.txt |
2013-01-15
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from Internal review |
2013-01-15
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2013-01-15
|
09 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2013-01-15
|
08-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2013-01-10
|
08-02 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-08-02.txt |
2013-01-10
|
08-01 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2013-01-10
|
08-01 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2013-01-10
|
08-01 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-01-09
|
08-01 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
2013-01-09
|
08-01 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2013-01-09
|
08-01 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2013-01-09
|
08-01 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2013-01-09
|
08-01 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-01-08
|
08-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-01-05
|
08-01 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-01-04
|
08-01 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2013-01-03
|
08-01 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-01-03
|
08-01 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
2013-01-03
|
08-01 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2013-01-10 from 2012-12-13 |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | version 08-01 adds line breaks |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2013-01-02
|
08-01 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-08-01.txt |
2013-01-02
|
08-00 | Sean Turner | This update adds one new item to the charter, which is captured in the penultimate paragraph. |
2013-01-02
|
08-00 | Sean Turner | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2013-01-02
|
08-00 | Sean Turner | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-08-00.txt |
2012-12-18
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-08.txt |
2012-12-18
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from IESG review |
2012-12-18
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2012-12-18
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2012-12-18
|
08 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2012-12-18
|
07-03 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2012-12-18
|
07-03 | Cindy Morgan | New version to fix spacing and line-break issues. |
2012-12-18
|
07-03 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-07-03.txt |
2012-12-13
|
07-02 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Approve" ballot |
2012-12-13
|
07-02 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to IESG review from Internal review |
2012-12-13
|
07-02 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-07-02.txt |
2012-12-13
|
07-01 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2012-12-12
|
07-01 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2012-12-12
|
07-01 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-07-01.txt |
2012-12-12
|
07-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] Removed my concern as Sean has indicated he will resolve it in the next revision |
2012-12-12
|
07-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Block |
2012-12-12
|
07-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot block] This is very trivial, but I believe it must be fixed for clarity. The proposed text says: The WG will revise the … [Ballot block] This is very trivial, but I believe it must be fixed for clarity. The proposed text says: The WG will revise the mandatory-to-implement algorithms for ESP and AH based on five years of experience with newer algorithms and cryptographic modes. This work will be based on draft-mcgrew-ipsec-me-esp-ah-reqts. I believe there is no proposal to revise the algorithms! The intent, I think is to revise the *list* of mandatory-to-implement algorithms. |
2012-12-12
|
07-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Block, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2012-12-12
|
07-00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2012-12-11
|
07-00 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2012-12-10
|
07-00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2012-12-04
|
07-00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2012-12-04
|
07-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2012-12-13 from 2012-08-16 |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | Responsible AD changed to Sean Turner |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | Recharter request from Sean Turner via RT |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2012-11-28
|
07-00 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-07-00.txt |
2012-08-21
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-07.txt |
2012-08-21
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from Internal review |
2012-08-21
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2012-08-21
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2012-08-21
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2012-08-16
|
06-00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2012-08-16
|
06-00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2012-08-16
|
06-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot comment] Is it time to fully close the window on updates to IKEv1? The charter says: Its purpose is to maintain the IPsec … [Ballot comment] Is it time to fully close the window on updates to IKEv1? The charter says: Its purpose is to maintain the IPsec standard and to facilitate discussion of clarifications, improvements, and extensions to IPsec, mostly to IKEv2. I guess the bit that bothers me is "mostly to". That leaves the door (or was it a window?) open enough for people to think that improvements and extensions to IVEv1 are in scope. Would it be possible to re-word this part of the charter to get some more clarity on what can and can't be considered in scope? |
2012-08-16
|
06-00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2012-08-15
|
06-00 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-08-16 |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved |
2012-08-08
|
06-00 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-06-00.txt |
2012-01-10
|
06 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-06.txt |
2010-02-23
|
05 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-05.txt |
2009-08-29
|
04 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-04.txt |
2009-08-29
|
03 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-03.txt |
2009-08-29
|
02 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-02.txt |
2008-07-08
|
01 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-ipsecme-01.txt |