Ballot for charter-ietf-netconf
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 17-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
One question: For work item 2, is it intended to have that be https-only? If so, should the charter say that? If not, why not?
You might consider moving the paragraph about producing a status report in a later stage to after the text about work items for the current phase. Item 1: Can you give the full draft names for the mentioned drafts? item 2: This seems like several items.
Could you expand on "secure HTTP"? Does this mean session encryption and authentication will be secure, one or the other, or something else? Thanks.
Hmm - how is the push mechanism going to work? There is a chance such a proposal might cause a fuss later, so could be useful to ensure we have a sane starting point now - do we?