Ballot for charter-ietf-slim
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
I would suggest being slightly more specific on the call routing aspect: OLD The group's initial focus will not be on call routing. NEW The group's initial focus will not be on supporting language-based call routing decisions.
From the milestones, I see that you want to submit "Multiple Language Content Type" to the IESG (based on draft-tomkinson-slim-multilangcontent)" If this draft is a compulsory starting point, I would make it clear in the charter, similarly to "In the real-time communication case, the group will produce a specification based on draft-gellens-slim-negotiating-human-language". Simply a question of consistency.
I'm a no objection considering Barry's block.
Agree on Barry's Block position ...
I'm a sheeple on this, Barry's block nails it.