Transport and Services Working Group
charter-ietf-tsvwg-07
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-15
|
07 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-07.txt |
2023-12-15
|
06-02 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) |
2023-12-15
|
06-02 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the charter |
2023-12-15
|
06-02 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2023-12-15
|
06-02 | Cindy Morgan | WG action text was changed |
2023-12-14
|
06-02 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit " DCCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses" as an Proposed Standard RFC", set description to "Submit " DCCP Extensions … Changed charter milestone "Submit " DCCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses" as an Proposed Standard RFC", set description to "Submit " DCCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses" as a Proposed Standard RFC" |
2023-12-14
|
06-02 | Martin Duke | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-06-02.txt |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | John Scudder | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Andrew Alston | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Andrew Alston |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot comment] # GEN AD review of charter-ietf-tsvwg-06-01 CC @larseggert ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose … [Ballot comment] # GEN AD review of charter-ietf-tsvwg-06-01 CC @larseggert ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Typos #### Paragraph 0 ``` - and publication of RFCs dealing with transport layer topics that are not in - ^ + and publication of RFCs dealing with transport-layer topics that are not in + ^ ``` #### "A", paragraph 15 ``` - Dec 2023 - Submit " DCCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses" as an - - ``` ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton |
2023-12-14
|
06-01 | Éric Vyncke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke |
2023-12-13
|
06-01 | Erik Kline | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline |
2023-12-13
|
06-01 | Paul Wouters | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters |
2023-12-13
|
06-01 | Jim Guichard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard |
2023-12-13
|
06-01 | Francesca Palombini | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini |
2023-12-12
|
06-01 | Martin Duke | [Ballot comment] Once again, the intent of this recharter is to remove references to the "Transport Area" without changing the technical scope of the WG. … [Ballot comment] Once again, the intent of this recharter is to remove references to the "Transport Area" without changing the technical scope of the WG. The charter also contains some current areas of focus, which I have updated. |
2023-12-12
|
06-01 | Martin Duke | Ballot comment text updated for Martin Duke |
2023-12-12
|
06-01 | Martin Duke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Duke |
2023-12-12
|
06-01 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker |
2023-12-11
|
06-01 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | Telechat date has been changed to 2023-12-14 from 2023-11-30 |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | Created "Approve" ballot |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG new work message text was changed |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2023-12-01
|
06-01 | Cindy Morgan | WG review text was changed |
2023-11-30
|
06-01 | Murray Kucherawy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy |
2023-11-30
|
06-01 | Martin Duke | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-06-01.txt |
2023-11-30
|
06-00 | Francesca Palombini | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini |
2023-11-29
|
06-00 | Paul Wouters | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters |
2023-11-29
|
06-00 | John Scudder | [Ballot comment] Nits -- OLD: The currently active TSVWG work items mostly falls under the following topics: NEW: The currently active TSVWG work items mostly … [Ballot comment] Nits -- OLD: The currently active TSVWG work items mostly falls under the following topics: NEW: The currently active TSVWG work items mostly fall under the following topics: OLD: (A) Maintenance and extensions of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol NEW: (A) Maintenance and extension of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol |
2023-11-29
|
06-00 | John Scudder | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder |
2023-11-28
|
06-00 | Zaheduzzaman Sarker | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker |
2023-11-28
|
06-00 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot comment] (4) Agreement by the AD, who, depending on the scope of the proposed work item, may decide that an IESG review is needed … [Ballot comment] (4) Agreement by the AD, who, depending on the scope of the proposed work item, may decide that an IESG review is needed first. - This could potentially be interpreted as meaning an IESG review of the document is needed, but I don't think that it was is intended here. Presumably the IESG review is of whether it is okay to adopt the work item. |
2023-11-28
|
06-00 | Robert Wilton | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton |
2023-11-27
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | [Ballot comment] This recharter updates the text to not refer to the Transport Area. It is not intended to increase the WG's technical scope, so … [Ballot comment] This recharter updates the text to not refer to the Transport Area. It is not intended to increase the WG's technical scope, so it makes an effort to describe what the "Transport Layer" is and is not. It also updates the current dominant themes, which are outdated. |
2023-11-27
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Ballot comment text updated for Martin Duke |
2023-11-20
|
06-00 | Jim Guichard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard |
2023-11-17
|
06-00 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot comment] Per the criteria listed in the "Work in TSVWG must satisfy four conditions" paragraph, it wasn't clear to me how these are or … [Ballot comment] Per the criteria listed in the "Work in TSVWG must satisfy four conditions" paragraph, it wasn't clear to me how these are or will provide a gating function. Criteria (1) - (3) seem like they are (should be) the universal criteria for all documents adopted into any WG. Consider if something more specific to this WG's dynamics is needed. |
2023-11-17
|
06-00 | Roman Danyliw | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw |
2023-11-13
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter title from 'Transport Area Working Group' to 'Transport and Services Working Group'. |
2023-11-12
|
06-00 | Erik Kline | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Duke |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Telechat date has been changed to 2023-11-30 from 2023-10-26 |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | WG action text was changed |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | WG review text was changed |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | WG review text was changed |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | State changed to Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) from Draft Charter |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2023-10-26 |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit "DTLS over SCTP" as a Proposed Standard RFC", set due date to March 2024 from March 2023 |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit "Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options" for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.", set due date to December 2023 from September 2023 |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit " Transport Options for UDP" as a Proposed Standard RFC", set due date to December 2023 from September 2023 |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit 'Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim' as a Proposed Standard RFC", resolved as "Done" |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Changed charter milestone "Submit 'Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP' as a BCP RFC", resolved as "Done" |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "Operational Guidance for Deployment of L4S in the Internet" as an Informational RFC", due November 2024, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "Careful convergence of congestion control from retained state" for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.", due July 2024, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit " DCCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses" as an Proposed Standard RFC", due December 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "User Ports for Experiments " for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.", due December 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "A Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) for Differentiated Services" as a Proposed Standard RFC", due December 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options" for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.", due September 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit " Transport Options for UDP" as a Proposed Standard RFC", due September 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit 'Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim' as a Proposed Standard RFC", due April 2023, from current … Added milestone "Submit 'Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim' as a Proposed Standard RFC", due April 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit 'Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP' as a BCP RFC", due April 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | Added milestone "Submit "DTLS over SCTP" as a Proposed Standard RFC", due March 2023, from current group milestones |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | The main purpose of this recharter is to remove references to the Transport Area, which will cease to exist in March 2024. The WG's scope … The main purpose of this recharter is to remove references to the Transport Area, which will cease to exist in March 2024. The WG's scope is not changing, but the charter now needs to define what a Transport Layer technology is. The second purpose is to update the list of active work areas, as RSVP is no longer an area of focus. UDP and DCCP are also more active. |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | State changed to Draft Charter from Approved |
2023-10-23
|
06-00 | Martin Duke | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-06-00.txt |
2020-03-25
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | Responsible AD changed to Martin Duke from Magnus Westerlund |
2019-03-27
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Responsible AD changed to Magnus Westerlund |
2011-05-31
|
06 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-06.txt |
2011-05-30
|
05 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-05.txt |
2009-08-29
|
04 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-04.txt |
2009-08-29
|
03 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-03.txt |
2009-08-29
|
02 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-02.txt |
1999-10-08
|
01 | (System) | New version available: charter-ietf-tsvwg-01.txt |