datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Analysis of Port Control Protocol (PCP) Failure Scenarios
draft-boucadair-pcp-failure-06

Active Internet-Draft (None)
Document Stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2013-05-16
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, xml, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

PCP Working Group                                           M. Boucadair
Internet-Draft                                            France Telecom
Intended status: Informational                                  R. Penno
Expires: November 17, 2013                                         Cisco
                                                            May 16, 2013

       Analysis of Port Control Protocol (PCP) Failure Scenarios
                     draft-boucadair-pcp-failure-06

Abstract

   This document identifies and analyzes several PCP failure scenarios.
   Identifying these failure scenarios is useful to assess the
   efficiency of the protocol and also to decide whether new PCP
   extensions are needed.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 17, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Boucadair & Penno      Expires November 17, 2013                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           PCP Failure Scenarios                  May 2013

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  PCP Client Failure Scenarios  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Change of the IP Address of The PCP Server  . . . . . . .   2
     2.2.  Application Crash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  PCP Client Crash  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.4.  Change of the Internal IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.5.  Change of the CPE WAN IP Address  . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.6.  UPnP IGD/PCP IWF  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   3.  Restart or Failure of the PCP Server  . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.1.  Basic Rule  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.2.  Clear PCP Mappings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.3.  State Redundancy is Enabled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.4.  Cold-Standby without State Redundancy . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.5.  Anycast Redundancy Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   6.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Appendix A.  PCP State Synchronization: Overview  . . . . . . . .   9
   Appendix B.  GET/NEXT Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     B.1.  OpCode Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     B.2.  OpCode-Specific Result Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     B.3.  Ordering and Equality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     B.4.  NEXT Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     B.5.  GET/NEXT PCP Client Theory of Operation . . . . . . . . .  14
     B.6.  GET/NEXT PCP Server Theory of Operation . . . . . . . . .  14
     B.7.  Flow Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18

1.  Introduction

   This document discusses several failure scenarios that may occur when
   deploying PCP [RFC6887].

2.  PCP Client Failure Scenarios

2.1.  Change of the IP Address of The PCP Server

   When a new IP address is used to reach its PCP Server, the PCP Client