This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update.
Abstract:
Various published proposals for use of the IPv6 flow label are
incompatible with its existing specification in RFC 3697.
Furthermore, very little practical use is made of the flow label,
partly due to some uncertainties about the correct interpretation of
the specification. This document proposes changes to the
specification in order to clarify it, making it clear what types of
usage are possible, and to introduce some additional flexibility.
Authors:
Shane Amante <shane@level3.net>
Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)
datatracker.ietf.org