Skip to main content

Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy
draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-07

Yes

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)

No Objection

(Benoît Claise)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Wesley Eddy)

Recuse

(Adrian Farrel)
(Pete Resnick)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2012-06-19 for -06) Unknown
Not sure this worth doing but should we state that the rules also apply to remote participants in the contribution paragraph?  Maybe add the following as a new second sentence:

  Remote participants as well as those participating in person at
  IETF meetings are bound by this definition.

Also should we add jabber in there to the first sentence?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2012-06-15 for -06) Unknown
Who's that Barry Liebe guy? Must be someone in love
with Berlin:-)
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-06-11 for -06) Unknown
The policies set out in [BCP79] state that each individual
   participant is responsible for disclosing or ensuring the disclosure
   of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) where:

   - they are aware of the IPR
   - the IPR is relevant to the IETF work they are participating in
   - the IPR is owned by the individual or by a company that employs or
     sponsors the individual's work.

I think that you should put an "and" after each list item.
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -06) Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse (for -06) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse (for -06) Unknown