Non-Normative Synonyms in RFCs

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2015-11-16 (latest revision 2015-06-23)
Stream ISE
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats plain text pdf xml html
Stream ISE state Finding Reviewers
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
Network Working Group                                          T. Hansen
Internet-Draft                                         AT&T Laboratories
Intended status: Informational                                D. Crocker
Expires: December 25, 2015                   Brandenburg InternetWorking
                                                           June 23, 2015

                     Non-Normative Synonyms in RFCs


   Specifications in RFCs contain normative keywords, as defined in RFC
   2119, to signify requirements, permission or prohibitions.  These
   include MUST, SHOULD and MAY, which are commonly recorded in all
   CAPITALS (but need not be).  The RFC 2119 words are sometimes also
   used with non-normative meaning; this non-normative usage can be
   confusing and it is better to restrict the RFC 2119 words to be used
   solely as normative directives.

   Happily, natural languages permit variation in phrasing, so that
   meaning can be retained without use of this otherwise-normative
   vocabulary.  For such situations, this document provides some
   alternatives to the normative vocabulary of RFC 2119.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 25, 2015.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Hansen & Crocker        Expires December 25, 2015               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft              RFC Non-Keywords                   June 2015

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   ( in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

1.  Words That Do Double Duty

   To indicate a degree of requirement, permission or prohibition for an
   aspect of a specification, words such as MUST, SHOULD and MAY are
   defined as normative vocabulary in the formal aspects of the RFC
   series [RFC2119].  However it is also natural to use them non-
   normatively, in a narrative fashion.  Even when this is carries no
   obvious potential confusion, such as within RFCs that do not invoke
   the conventions of RFC 2119, non-normative use of these words in RFCs
   invites confusion for the reader; their normative meaning is too
   deeply ingrained in the culture of the RFC series.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

   Fortunately, there are other words readily available, in lieu of the
   RFC 2119 words, when a non-normative meaning is intended.  These
   alternatives, or their equivalents, are suggested for use instead of
   their normatively-encumbered vocabulary.

Hansen & Crocker        Expires December 25, 2015               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft              RFC Non-Keywords                   June 2015

   | RFC 2119    | When Used With This Meaning      | Alternative      |
   | Word        |                                  | Word(s)          |
   | MUST,       | indicates that something is      | needs to,        |
   | REQUIRED,   | essential                        | necessary        |
   | SHALL       |                                  |                  |
   |             |                                  |                  |
   | SHOULD,     | indicates that something is      | ought to,        |
Show full document text