datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.51.p2, 2013-06-11
Report a bug

User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0
draft-hardjono-oauth-umacore-06

Active Internet-Draft (None)
Document Stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2012-12-27
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, pdf, html

Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

Network Working Group                                   T. Hardjono, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                       MIT
Intended status: Standards Track                       December 27, 2012
Expires: June 30, 2013

             User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0
                    draft-hardjono-oauth-umacore-06

Abstract

   User-Managed Access (UMA) is a profile of OAuth 2.0.  UMA defines how
   resource owners can control access to their protected resources made
   by clients operated by arbitrary rquesting parties, where the
   resources reside on any number of resource servers, and where a
   centralized authorization server governs access based on resource
   owner policy.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on June 30, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as

Hardjono                  Expires June 30, 2013                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                  UMA Core                   December 2012

   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     1.1.  Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     1.2.  Basic Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     1.3.  Endpoints, Endpoint Protection, and Tokens . . . . . . . .  8
     1.4.  Scope Types, Resource Sets, Permissions, and
           Authorization  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     1.5.  Authorization Server Configuration Data  . . . . . . . . . 12
   2.  Protecting a Resource  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     2.1.  Resource Server Obtains PAT  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     2.2.  Resource Server Registers Sets of Resources to Be
           Protected  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
   3.  Getting Authorization and Accessing a Resource . . . . . . . . 16
     3.1.  Client Attempts to Access Protected Resource . . . . . . . 18
       3.1.1.  Client Presents No RPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
       3.1.2.  Client Presents an RPT That Has Insufficient
               Authorization Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
       3.1.3.  Client Presents a Valid RPT with Sufficient
               Authorization Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
     3.2.  Resource Server Registers a Permission With
           Authorization Server . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
     3.3.  Resource Server Determines the RPT Status  . . . . . . . . 22
       3.3.1.  UMA Bearer Token Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
     3.4.  Client Asks Authorization Server for RPT and
           Authorization Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
       3.4.1.  Client Obtains AAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
       3.4.2.  Client Obtains RPT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
       3.4.3.  Client Asks for Authorization Data . . . . . . . . . . 27
     3.5.  Claims-Gathering Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
       3.5.1.  Claims-Gathering Flow for Clients Operated by
               End-Users  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
         3.5.1.1.  OpenID Connect Claim Profile . . . . . . . . . . . 31
   4.  Error Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
     4.1.  OAuth Error Responses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
     4.2.  UMA Error Responses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
   5.  Specification of Additional Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
     5.1.  Specifying Profiles of UMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34