datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.7.1.p2, 2014-10-29
Report a bug

Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-06

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2011-09-07 RFC Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-09-07 RFC Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'BCP 166; RFC 6365' added
2011-09-07 RFC (System) RFC published
2011-07-19 06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-07-18 06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-07-18 06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-07-18 06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-07-18 06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-07-18 06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-07-18 06 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-07-14 06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-07-14 06 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2011-07-12 06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
This is updated to add Catherine's comment:

I'm curious to see how Dan's 1st discuss point shakes out.  If it ...[show all]
2011-07-12 06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-09 06 Pete Resnick State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-07-09 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-06.txt (diff from previous)
2011-07-09 05 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I've cleared my DISCUSS.
2011-07-09 05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-07 05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-06 05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-06 05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-06 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-05.txt (diff from previous)
2011-07-02 04 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I think this document should be published as an Informational RFC.
  It seems to play a very similar role to RFC 2828, which ...[show all]
2011-07-02 04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-01 04 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-07-14
2011-06-30 04 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-06-30 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-06-30 04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-30 04 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-30 04 Pete Resnick State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-06-30 04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
In Section 7.1 the definition ends with "<stringprep>" but there is no
such reference.

---

While I found the indications of source references ...[show all]
2011-06-30 04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-30 04 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-06-29 04 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-29 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-04.txt (diff from previous)
2011-06-29 03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Ron picked up chains of definitions that I also found
confusing.  I had one other specific question and a more abstract
question:

1 ...[show all]
2011-06-29 03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-29 03 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I think this document should be published as an Informational RFC.
  It seems to play a very similar role to RFC 2828, which ...[show all]
2011-06-29 03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-29 03 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I don't agree that this document needs BCP status as currently formulated. We can find a way to address the downref inconvenience ...[show all]
2011-06-29 03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-29 03 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. section 3.1 - why is W3C called 'This group' rather than 'This organization' or 'This consortium'?

2. Appendix C should mention the ...[show all]
2011-06-29 03 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Updated DISCUSS taking into account changes from 02 to 03:

1. One of the major changes from 3536 is that the future RFC ...[show all]
2011-06-28 03 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-28 03 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-06-28 03 Pete Resnick
PROTO writeup for draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02

The Applications Area Working Group requests the publication of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02 as a BCP, obsoleting RFC 3536, which is Informational.

(1.a ...[show all]
2011-06-28 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-03.txt (diff from previous)
2011-06-28 02 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
1) The definitions in this document are not normative, but the document is a BCP. Isn't that a contradiction?

2) You say ...[show all]
2011-06-28 02 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-28 02 Barry Leiba Changed protocol writeup
2011-06-28 02 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
What no proto write-up ;)

I'm curious to see how Dan's 1st discuss point shakes out.  If it's really going to ...[show all]
2011-06-28 02 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-28 02 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-27 02 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-27 02 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(1) s/provides identifiers/provide identifiers/ in definition
of language (standards is plural)

(2) s/for global from the/for global use from ...[show all]
2011-06-27 02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-27 02 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. section 1.1 s/tuturial/tutorial/

2. section 3.1 - why is W3C called 'This group' rather than 'This organization' or 'This ...[show all]
2011-06-27 02 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
1. One of the major changes from 3536 is that the future RFC aims to be a BCP, while 3536 was Informational. I ...[show all]
2011-06-27 02 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-26 02 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2011-06-26 02 Pete Resnick Ballot has been issued
2011-06-26 02 Pete Resnick Created "Approve" ballot
2011-06-16 02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-06-16 02 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To ...[show all]
2011-06-16 02 Pete Resnick Last Call was requested
2011-06-16 02 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-06-16 02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-06-16 02 (System) Last call text was added
2011-06-16 02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-06-12 02 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-30
2011-06-12 02 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-10 02 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from AD is watching.
2011-06-09 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt (diff from previous)
2011-05-25 01 Barry Leiba In WG last call
2011-05-25 01 Barry Leiba IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2011-05-20 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-01.txt (diff from previous)
2011-05-15 00 Pete Resnick State changed to AD is watching from Publication Requested.
2011-05-15 00 Pete Resnick Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-05-03 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-00.txt