datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Applicability Statement for RFC 2544: Use on Production Networks Considered Harmful
draft-ietf-bmwg-2544-as-08

RFC
Document Stream: IETF
Last updated: 2012-10-22
Replaces: draft-chairs-bmwg-2544-as
Intended RFC status: Informational
Other versions: (expired, archived): plain text, pdf, html

IETF State: WG Document (bmwg)
Document shepherd:Bill Cerveny
Shepherd writeup
Consensus:Unknown

IESG State: RFC 6815
IANA Action State: No IC 
On agenda of 2012-09-13 IESG telechat (returning item)
Responsible AD: Ron Bonica
IESG Note: Document Shepherd: Bill Cerveny <wcerveny@wjcerveny.com>
Send notices to: bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-2544-as@tools.ietf.org, wcerveny@wjcerveny.com

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-2544-as.

Abstract:
The Benchmarking Methodology Working Group (BMWG) has been developing key performance metrics and laboratory test methods since 1990, and continues this work at present. The methods described in RFC 2544 are intended to generate traffic that overloads network device resources in order to assess their capacity. Overload of shared resources would likely be harmful to user traffic performance on a production network, and there are further negative consequences identified with production application of the methods. This memo clarifies the scope of RFC 2544 and other IETF BMWG benchmarking work for isolated test environments only, and it encourages new standards activity for measurement methods applicable outside that scope. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Authors:
Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
Jim McQuaid <jim@turnipvideo.com>
Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)