Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Has enough positions to pass.
Comment (2003-10-02) 
Missing IPR section
Comment (2003-09-12) 
This seems, well, highly vendor-specific. I guess this is OK...
Comment (2003-10-01) 
Section 3 says: "It is assumed that all service providers permitted onto
an access providers network are trusted entities that will cooperate
to insure peaceful coexistence." Please change "insure" to "ensure."
Comment (2003-10-02) 
> a secure SNMPv3 link between the PS and the SNMP entity in the
What is PS?