Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES.
From the shepherd writeup:
> There was a concern about a possible copyright issue, but only in
> respect to a pre-RFC5378 RFC. Parts of RFC 3647 have been used in the
> draft, so the authors have contacted the authors of RFC 3647 requesting
> permission to use text from it. All who have replied (four out of five)
> have given that permission.
Response from Tomofumi Okubo:
"We received the permission from the 5th author of RFC3647 shortly after
the writeup was submitted."
So this former DISCUSS is now cleared.
- 1.1: Is this really for "users" to evaluate the strength of
DNSSEC? I don't know any users who'd do that. Maybe admins
of some sort.
- PKI definition: I'd love if you deleted non-repudiation
since a PKI, and DNSSEC in particular, doesn't get you that.
Thanks for addressing my discuss/comment positions.