A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

Benoit Claise No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Stephen Farrell No Objection

Comment (2012-07-17 for -08)
- 1.1: Is this really for "users" to evaluate the strength of
DNSSEC? I don't know any users who'd do that.  Maybe admins
of some sort.

- PKI definition: I'd love if you deleted non-repudiation
since a PKI, and DNSSEC in particular, doesn't get you that.
(By itself.)

Brian Haberman No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Barry Leiba (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2012-07-19 for -08)
From the shepherd writeup:
> There was a concern about a possible copyright issue, but only in
> respect to a pre-RFC5378 RFC.  Parts of RFC 3647 have been used in the
> draft, so the authors have contacted the authors of RFC 3647 requesting
> permission to use text from it.  All who have replied (four out of five)
> have given that permission.

Response from Tomofumi Okubo:
"We received the permission from the 5th author of RFC3647 shortly after
the writeup was submitted."
So this former DISCUSS is now cleared.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

Martin Stiemerling No Objection

(spt) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2012-10-02 for -10)
Thanks for addressing my discuss/comment positions.