A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements
Summary: Needs a YES.
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
( Ron Bonica ) Yes
( Stewart Bryant ) No Objection
( Gonzalo Camarillo ) No Objection
Benoit Claise No Objection
( Wesley Eddy ) No Objection
( Adrian Farrel ) No Objection
Stephen Farrell No Objection
Comment (2012-07-17 for -08)
- 1.1: Is this really for "users" to evaluate the strength of DNSSEC? I don't know any users who'd do that. Maybe admins of some sort. - PKI definition: I'd love if you deleted non-repudiation since a PKI, and DNSSEC in particular, doesn't get you that. (By itself.)
Brian Haberman No Objection
( Russ Housley ) (was Discuss) No Objection
Barry Leiba (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2012-07-19 for -08)
From the shepherd writeup: > There was a concern about a possible copyright issue, but only in > respect to a pre-RFC5378 RFC. Parts of RFC 3647 have been used in the > draft, so the authors have contacted the authors of RFC 3647 requesting > permission to use text from it. All who have replied (four out of five) > have given that permission. Response from Tomofumi Okubo: "We received the permission from the 5th author of RFC3647 shortly after the writeup was submitted." So this former DISCUSS is now cleared.
( Pete Resnick ) No Objection
( Robert Sparks ) No Objection
Martin Stiemerling No Objection
( spt ) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2012-10-02 for -10)
Thanks for addressing my discuss/comment positions.