datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.6.4.p1, 2014-10-20
Report a bug

Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)
draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-19

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2014-09-26 19 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2014-09-25 19 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from Approved-announcement to be sent
2014-09-25 19 Ted Lemon IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from RFC Ed Queue
2014-09-24 19 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2014-09-24 19 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2014-09-24 19 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2014-09-24 19 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2014-09-24 19 Ted Lemon IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2014-09-24 19 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2014-09-22 19 Thomas Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-19.txt (diff from previous)
2014-09-22 18 Thomas Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-18.txt (diff from previous)
2014-09-15 17 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.
2014-09-15 17 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-09-15 17 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from No Objection
2014-09-15 17 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-09-05 17 Thomas Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-17.txt (diff from previous)
2014-09-04 16 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]


The original DISCUSS and COMMENT points are below. I
think only this one remains to be discussed:

(3) Continuing to support the 1536 ...[show all]
2014-09-04 16 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-08-23 16 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

The original DISCUSS and COMMENT points are below. I
think only this one remains to be discussed:

(3) Continuing to support the 1536 ...[show all]
2014-08-23 16 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

--- original discuss below

This review is based on the diff from 5201 [1]

  [1] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc5201&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14 ...[show all]
2014-08-23 16 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2014-08-23 16 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

Sent a mail Aug 23rd. No response seen except to the NULL issue
dealt with in 5205bis, -16 doesn't address.


--- original discuss ...[show all]
2014-08-23 16 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2014-08-12 16 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for posting -16.  There's only one minor thing that's still missed -- you can change it or not, as you see ...[show all]
2014-08-12 16 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2014-08-11 16 Thomas Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-16.txt (diff from previous)
2014-07-28 15 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for posting -15, which resolves most of my comments about the IANA Considerations.  I'm updating this with the things that remain ...[show all]
2014-07-28 15 Barry Leiba Ballot discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2014-07-28 15 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for posting -15, which resolves most of my comments about the IANA Considerations.  I'm updating this with the things that remain ...[show all]
2014-07-28 15 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
  HIT Suite ID

      This specification creates a new registry for "HIT Suite ID".
      This is different than the existing registry for "Suite ID ...[show all]
2014-07-28 15 Barry Leiba Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2014-07-28 15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2014-07-28 15 Thomas Henderson IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA - Not OK
2014-07-28 15 Thomas Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-15.txt (diff from previous)
2014-07-10 14 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2014-07-10 14 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
4.4.1:

  Maximum Segment Lifetime (MSL):  Maximum time that a TCP segment is
      expected to spend in the network.

TCP segment? First ...[show all]
2014-07-10 14 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-07-09 14 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
Looking forward to seeing the discuss resolutions.
2014-07-09 14 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2014-07-09 14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
I need to add a DISCUSS to Ted's on IANA registry issues.

1. It seems to me that this document needs to ...[show all]
2014-07-09 14 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
-- Section 4.1.8 --

  Therefore, the Responder SHOULD should select its HIT from the same
  HIT Suite as the Initiator's HIT

"SHOULD ...[show all]
2014-07-09 14 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-07-09 14 Richard Barnes [Ballot comment]
I agree with Stephen's DISCUSS.  The cryptographic algorithm choices here seem incrementally better than RFC 5201, but not very forward-looking.
2014-07-09 14 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2014-07-08 14 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2014-06-26 14 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2014-07-10 from 2014-06-26
2014-06-26 14 Ted Lemon [Ballot discuss]
This has outstanding IANA questions that need to be addressed, please.
2014-06-26 14 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Lemon has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2014-06-26 14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
This review is based on the diff from 5201 [1]

  [1] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc5201&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14.txt

Work started ...[show all]
2014-06-26 14 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- abstract: SIGMA-compliant is a bit of a mouthful for an
abstract - how many readers do we really expect to get
that?

- 1.1 ...[show all]
2014-06-26 14 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-06-26 14 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2014-06-26 14 Benoit Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2014-06-25 14 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2014-06-25 14 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-06-24 14 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2014-06-24 14 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART review from Tom Taylor raised a couple of issues that in my mind require at least clarification. The authors have acknowledged ...[show all]
2014-06-24 14 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2014-06-23 14 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I do have two small points to discuss in section 5.2 ...[show all]
2014-06-23 14 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2014-06-23 14 Ted Lemon IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2014-06-11 14 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2014-06-08 14 Ted Lemon Ballot has been issued
2014-06-08 14 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2014-06-08 14 Ted Lemon Created "Approve" ballot
2014-06-08 14 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was changed
2014-06-08 14 Ted Lemon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-06-26
2014-06-06 14 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA - Not OK from IANA - Review Needed
2014-06-06 14 Pearl Liang
IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14.  Authors SHOULD review the comments and/or questions below.  Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any ...[show all]
2014-05-28 14 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2014-05-28 14 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>;
CC: <hipsec@ietf.org>;
Reply-To: ietf ...[show all]
2014-05-28 14 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2014-05-28 14 Ted Lemon Last call was requested
2014-05-28 14 Ted Lemon Last call announcement was generated
2014-05-28 14 Ted Lemon Ballot approval text was generated
2014-05-28 14 Ted Lemon Ballot writeup was generated
2014-05-28 14 Ted Lemon IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo
PROTO Writeup for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis

(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is
this the ...[show all]
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo State Change Notice email list changed to hip-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis@tools.ietf.org
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo Responsible AD changed to Ted Lemon
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo IESG state changed to Publication Requested
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo Changed document writeup
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo Document shepherd changed to Gonzalo Camarillo
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2014-03-20 14 Gonzalo Camarillo Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2013-10-06 14 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-14.txt (diff from previous)
2013-09-05 13 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-13.txt (diff from previous)
2013-06-30 12 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12.txt (diff from previous)
2013-02-25 11 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-11.txt (diff from previous)
2012-11-25 10 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-10.txt (diff from previous)
2012-07-16 09 Robert Moskowitz New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-09.txt (diff from previous)
2012-03-12 08 Tom Henderson New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-08.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-31 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-07.txt (diff from previous)
2011-07-09 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-06.txt (diff from previous)
2011-03-14 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05.txt (diff from previous)
2011-01-20 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-04.txt (diff from previous)
2010-10-23 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-03.txt (diff from previous)
2010-09-03 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-02.txt (diff from previous)
2010-09-01 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-01.txt (diff from previous)
2010-08-23 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-00.txt