datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.7.1.p2, 2014-10-29
Report a bug

The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments
draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-14

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2013-01-25 RFC (System) RFC published
2012-08-22 14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22 14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22 14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22 14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22 14 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2012-02-13 14 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-02-10 14 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-02-09 14 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-09 14 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-09 14 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-09 14 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-02-09 14 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2012-02-09 14 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-02-08 14 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-08 14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-14.txt (diff from previous)
2012-02-08 13 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The title talks about "LISP for multicast environments" but the Abstract
is specific to "inter-domain multicast routing". Should the document
title be updated ...[show all]
2012-02-08 13 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Updating my Discuss in line with revision -13

As previously noted on other LISP documents, I would like a pointer to the generic ...[show all]
2012-02-07 13 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
The following issue would be a blocking comment in an architecture or a standards track specification, but I am persuaded that in the ...[show all]
2012-02-07 13 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-07 13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2012-02-07 13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-13.txt (diff from previous)
2012-01-19 12 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-01-19 12 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-18 12 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Now that the base LISP protocol document has been published, I've cleared my Discuss on this document.
2012-01-18 12 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-18 12 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-18 12 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The title talks about "LISP for multicast environments" but the Abstract
is specific to "inter-domain multicast routing". Should the document
title be updated ...[show all]
2012-01-18 12 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have no objection to the content of this document, and I thank you
for spelling out (and calling out) the considerable complexity ...[show all]
2012-01-18 12 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-17 12 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
"By using the traffic engineering features of LISP" needs a ref.

The subtleties of different m/c paths surely belongs after the basic ...[show all]
2012-01-17 12 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
This document defines a set of terms EID, RLOC etc which at first sight seem identical to the unicast terms. However the description ...[show all]
2012-01-17 12 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-16 12 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-16 12 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Section 7 identifies small, but required changes to PIM-SSM, PIM-BiDIR and PIM-ASM. Doesn't that require that this draft UPDATE the RFCs that ...[show all]
2012-01-12 12 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-01-19
2012-01-11 12 Jari Arkko Document placed on today's informal IESG telechat to try to clear the remaining issues.
2012-01-03 12 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
I still think you need to say that security in this environment is
basically an unknown, which seems to be the case. I ...[show all]
2012-01-03 12 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-03 12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-12.txt (diff from previous)
2011-12-13 11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
I still think you need to say that security in this environment is
basically an unknown, which seems to be the case. I ...[show all]
2011-11-14 11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-11.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-17 10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-17 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-10.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-17 09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- It'd be good to know if this use of LISP claims some benefit
over "ordinary" multicast, or if you're just making ...[show all]
2011-10-17 09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(I just checked my local archive of the iesg list and didn't see a
mail with my discuss on -08, so I ...[show all]
2011-10-06 09 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-10-06 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-10-06 09 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
It seems to me that multicast LISP is naturally a bolt-on to LISP.
I cannot review it until having reviewed and agreed the ...[show all]
2011-10-06 09 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Record from No Objection
2011-10-06 09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I agree with Ron and Ralph

This document cannot be reviewed meaningfully before at least  the LISP base document has been reviewed.
2011-10-06 09 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-06 09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-09.txt (diff from previous)
2011-10-05 08 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I support Peter's DISCUSS
2011-10-05 08 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05 08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- It'd be good to know if this use of LISP claims some benefit
over "ordinary" multicast, or if you're just making ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(I bet this was a 100% predictable discuss, sorry for that. I'm even
kind of wondering if its deliberate:-)

It's really ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-05 08 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
draft-ietf-lisp-ms contains a section entitled "Open Issues and Considerations", which provides a good start toward understanding the parameters of the experiment we're ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05 08 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
I concur with Ralph's evaluation, but will hold a separate discuss so that the termination of his evaluation does not unintentionally terminate ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-05 08 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-05 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
In the numbered list of scenarios in section 9.1, there are a couple
of occurrences of the term "LISP sites."  Should "LISP ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I've reviewed this document keeping in mind the DISCUSS positions on
other LISP documents. I found I could review the document, based ...[show all]
2011-10-05 08 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-10-04 08 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review by
  Kathleen Moriarty on 3-October-2011.  The review can be found here:
  http://www.ietf ...[show all]
2011-10-04 08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-27 08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-09-22 08 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-09-22 08 Amanda Baber [Note]: 'Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>; is the document shepherd.' added by Amanda Baber
2011-09-14 08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-09-14 08 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-09-14 08 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-09-14 08 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-10-06
2011-09-13 08 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-09-13 08 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To ...[show all]
2011-09-13 08 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-09-13 08 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-09-13 08 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-09-13 08 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-09-13 08 (System) Last call text was added
2011-09-13 08 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-09-13 08 Jari Arkko Thanks for the updated draft. I have sent the draft to IETF Last Call.
2011-09-12 08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-09-12 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-08.txt (diff from previous)
2011-08-20 07 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
2011-08-20 07 Jari Arkko
Continuing my review.

The document was a pleasure to read and is in very good shape, despite some areas which were quite complex (such as ...[show all]
2011-08-19 07 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-07-28 07 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Wassim Haddad is the Shepherd and has reviewed this version
and believes it is ready to be forwarded to the IESG.

(1.b ...[show all]
2011-07-28 07 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-28 07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>; is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-09 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-07.txt (diff from previous)
2011-06-20 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-06.txt (diff from previous)
2011-04-05 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-05.txt (diff from previous)
2010-10-12 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-04.txt (diff from previous)
2010-04-17 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-03.txt (diff from previous)
2010-04-02 02 (System) Document has expired
2009-09-30 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-02.txt (diff from previous)
2009-05-29 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-01.txt (diff from previous)
2009-05-26 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-00.txt