The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4
draft-ietf-manet-dsr-10
Yes
(Bill Fenner)
No Objection
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Mark Townsley)
(Russ Housley)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-04-20)
Unknown
References should definitely be split normative/informative.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-04-22)
Unknown
We assume that a node receiving a corrupted packet can detect the error and discard the packet. Is this "receipt" as in end-point receipt, or nodes along the route receiving then discarding the packet? I am assuming that "end-point receipt" is meant here--if not, some clarification may be in order. Comments below do not anticipate any change in the document. Since the document is going for experimental, it might be useful to examine at what rate routes "overheard" are used. Depending on the rate of change and the available resources, it seems like it may be optimal in some circumstances to avoid learning overheard routes. I think it would also be valuable to test the routes used in "Salvaged" packets against the case in which the node originating the packet also had multiple routes to see if a pattern emerges in which salvaged packets had significantly better or worse routes than the alternate routes available at the origin.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Abstain
Abstain
(2006-05-15)
Unknown
I decided to change my DISCUSS to ABSTAIN. I don't understand why the authors have been unresponsive but since it's over a year, let's be done with it, since it's Experimental anyway. This draft applies to IPv4 only. The title should say that by adding "using IPv4" to the end, or something like that. Furthermore, the text states that "... and operation of DSR with IPv6 [7], are covered in other documents." [7] is only a reference to the basic IPv6 spec. I'd expect to see at least a "work in progress" reference to substantive work on DSR for IPv6, if the quoted statement is correct.