Skip to main content

Expert Review for Incident Object Description Exchange Format (IODEF) Extensions in IANA XML Registry
draft-ietf-mile-iodef-xmlreg-01

Yes

(Sean Turner)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Abstain


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-06-05) Unknown
Section 1, Introduction
IODEF extensions via class extension through AdditionalData and
   RecordItem elements, as per section 5.2 of [RFC5070], generally
   register their namespaces and schemas with the IANA XML Namespace
   registry at ...

=> remove "generally"

- There is one nit catched by the nit checker:

=> The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC5070, but
the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-06-05) Unknown
Consider "designated by the IESG" instead of "designated by the IETF Security Area Directors."
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2012-06-05) Unknown
  Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review by
  Suresh Krishnan on 5-Jun-2012.  The review can be found here:
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg07483.html
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss) Abstain
Abstain (2012-06-07) Unknown
This document defines no protocol, does not say how to implement a protocol, and does not have anything to do with a protocol except for information about how an IANA registry is to be used. This should be BCP.