Skip to main content

Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-03

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2005-01-28
03 Bill Fenner
In Authors' 48 Hours:
From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3988
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 …
In Authors' 48 Hours:
From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3988
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:57:40 -0800
To: ben@layer8.net, kireeti@juniper.net
Cc: RFC Editor , Alex Zinin
    , Bill Fenner ,
    swallow@cisco.com, loa@pi.se
2004-09-02
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-09-01
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-09-01
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-09-01
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-08-31
03 Alex Zinin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Alex Zinin
2004-06-02
03 Alex Zinin pinged the chairs about the RFC-Ed note again.
2004-04-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-03.txt
2004-04-03
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02
2004-04-02
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-02
03 Margaret Cullen
[Ballot comment]
While I'm not sure that this cold be subject of a discuss, the level of jargon (unexpanded acronyms in particular) in this document …
[Ballot comment]
While I'm not sure that this cold be subject of a discuss, the level of jargon (unexpanded acronyms in particular) in this document makes it hard to understand.
2004-04-02
03 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
carry MTU information for a FEC between adjacent LSRs in LDP Label

expand/define FEC?

Ditto for other terms on first use? E.g., TLV? …
[Ballot comment]
carry MTU information for a FEC between adjacent LSRs in LDP Label

expand/define FEC?

Ditto for other terms on first use? E.g., TLV?

> 2.4. MTU TLV

surprised that there isn't a line here saying length is always 2 (or
whatever it is, since its presumably fixed.)

>    Changes in MTU for sections of an LSP may cause intermediate LSRs to
>    generate unsolicited label Mapping messages to advertise the new MTU.
>    LSRs which do not support MTU signalling MUST accept these messages,
>    but MAY ignore them (see Section 2.1).
>

don't understand the reference to 2.1. Also wording is odd, saying an
implementation that doesn't support this spec "MAY" ignore
messages. Don't they kind of do that be definition? Certainly not an
implementation decision in the MAY sense.
2004-04-02
03 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-02
03 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-04-02
03 Allison Mankin [Ballot comment]
The TCP spoofing attack and the remedy are way too tersely mentioned -
it's impossible to understand how they fit in.
2004-04-02
03 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-04-02
03 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-04-01
03 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-01
03 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-04-01
03 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-03-30
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
There are a lot of acronyms in the first two paragraphs of the
  Introduction that are not expanded.

  Please add a …
[Ballot comment]
There are a lot of acronyms in the first two paragraphs of the
  Introduction that are not expanded.

  Please add a pointer to section 5 of [2] in the Security
  Considerations.
2004-03-30
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-03-30
03 Scott Hollenbeck
[Ballot comment]
The draft says it updates RFC 3036, which implies it should also be a Standards Track document and not Experimental as currently …
[Ballot comment]
The draft says it updates RFC 3036, which implies it should also be a Standards Track document and not Experimental as currently identified.  Either that or the document should be changed to not update 3036.
2004-03-30
03 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-29
03 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed as a candidate for Experimental, since that was the category on the agenda;
note that the document lists a category of Standards …
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed as a candidate for Experimental, since that was the category on the agenda;
note that the document lists a category of Standards Track, and an RFC Editor
note to clear that up is required.
2004-03-29
03 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-03-26
03 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-03-26
03 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin
2004-03-26
03 Alex Zinin Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin
2004-03-26
03 Alex Zinin Created "Approve" ballot
2004-03-25
03 Alex Zinin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::External Party by Alex Zinin
2004-03-25
03 Alex Zinin No implementations of this spec. The WG would like to change the target status to EXP.
2004-03-25
03 Alex Zinin Intended Status has been changed to Experimental from Proposed Standard
2004-03-25
03 Alex Zinin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 by Alex Zinin
2003-12-10
03 Alex Zinin State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::External Party from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin
2003-12-10
03 Alex Zinin waiting for implementation info
2003-12-10
03 Alex Zinin [Note]: 'waiting for update
AZ: check with chairs' has been cleared by Alex Zinin
2003-11-14
03 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-10-31
03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-10-31
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-10-30
03 Alex Zinin Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin
2003-10-30
03 Alex Zinin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin
2003-10-30
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2003-10-30
03 (System) Last call text was added
2003-10-30
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-10-22
03 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alex Zinin
2003-10-08
03 Dinara Suleymanova Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Standard
2003-10-08
03 Dinara Suleymanova State Changes to Publication Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Dinara Suleymanova
2003-10-08
03 Dinara Suleymanova Intended Status has been changed to Standard from Proposed Standard
2003-10-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-02.txt
2003-06-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-01.txt
2003-03-22
03 Alex Zinin Taking over after Scott
2003-03-22
03 Alex Zinin Shepherding AD has been changed to Zinin, Alex from Bradner, Scott
2002-10-05
03 Scott Bradner State Changes to AD Evaluation  -- New ID Needed from AD Evaluation  -- External Party by sob
2002-08-15
03 Scott Bradner 2002-08-15 - nomalize state name
2002-08-15
03 Scott Bradner responsible has been changed to Working Group from Scott
2002-08-15
03 Scott Bradner
State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author)                    from New Version Coming            …
State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author)                    from New Version Coming                                by sob
2002-07-29
03 Scott Bradner 2002-07-29 - comments to WG chairs
2002-07-29
03 Scott Bradner A new comment added
by sob
2002-07-29
03 Stephen Coya
State Changes to New Version Coming                                from Last Call Issued  …
State Changes to New Version Coming                                from Last Call Issued                                  by scoya
2002-07-29
03 Stephen Coya responsible has been changed to Scott from IETF Secretary
2002-07-29
03 Stephen Coya
State Changes to Last Call Issued                                  from Last Call …
State Changes to Last Call Issued                                  from Last Call Requested                              by scoya
2002-07-29
03 Scott Bradner 2002-07-29 - last call requested
2002-07-29
03 Scott Bradner responsible has been changed to IETF Secretary from Scott
2002-07-29
03 Scott Bradner
State Changes to Last Call Requested                              from Pre AD Evaluation    …
State Changes to Last Call Requested                              from Pre AD Evaluation                                by sob
2002-07-23
03 Stephen Coya Draft Added by scoya
2002-07-01
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-00.txt