Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-03
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2005-01-28
|
03 | Bill Fenner | In Authors' 48 Hours: From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3988 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 … In Authors' 48 Hours: From: RFC Editor Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3988 NOW AVAILABLE Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:57:40 -0800 To: ben@layer8.net, kireeti@juniper.net Cc: RFC Editor , Alex Zinin , Bill Fenner , swallow@cisco.com, loa@pi.se |
2004-09-02
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-09-01
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-09-01
|
03 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-09-01
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-08-31
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Alex Zinin |
2004-06-02
|
03 | Alex Zinin | pinged the chairs about the RFC-Ed note again. |
2004-04-09
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-03.txt |
2004-04-03
|
03 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot comment] While I'm not sure that this cold be subject of a discuss, the level of jargon (unexpanded acronyms in particular) in this document … [Ballot comment] While I'm not sure that this cold be subject of a discuss, the level of jargon (unexpanded acronyms in particular) in this document makes it hard to understand. |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot comment] carry MTU information for a FEC between adjacent LSRs in LDP Label expand/define FEC? Ditto for other terms on first use? E.g., TLV? … [Ballot comment] carry MTU information for a FEC between adjacent LSRs in LDP Label expand/define FEC? Ditto for other terms on first use? E.g., TLV? > 2.4. MTU TLV surprised that there isn't a line here saying length is always 2 (or whatever it is, since its presumably fixed.) > Changes in MTU for sections of an LSP may cause intermediate LSRs to > generate unsolicited label Mapping messages to advertise the new MTU. > LSRs which do not support MTU signalling MUST accept these messages, > but MAY ignore them (see Section 2.1). > don't understand the reference to 2.1. Also wording is odd, saying an implementation that doesn't support this spec "MAY" ignore messages. Don't they kind of do that be definition? Certainly not an implementation decision in the MAY sense. |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] The TCP spoofing attack and the remedy are way too tersely mentioned - it's impossible to understand how they fit in. |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-04-02
|
03 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2004-04-01
|
03 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-01
|
03 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-04-01
|
03 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-03-30
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] There are a lot of acronyms in the first two paragraphs of the Introduction that are not expanded. Please add a … [Ballot comment] There are a lot of acronyms in the first two paragraphs of the Introduction that are not expanded. Please add a pointer to section 5 of [2] in the Security Considerations. |
2004-03-30
|
03 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-03-30
|
03 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot comment] The draft says it updates RFC 3036, which implies it should also be a Standards Track document and not Experimental as currently … [Ballot comment] The draft says it updates RFC 3036, which implies it should also be a Standards Track document and not Experimental as currently identified. Either that or the document should be changed to not update 3036. |
2004-03-30
|
03 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-03-29
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] Reviewed as a candidate for Experimental, since that was the category on the agenda; note that the document lists a category of Standards … [Ballot comment] Reviewed as a candidate for Experimental, since that was the category on the agenda; note that the document lists a category of Standards Track, and an RFC Editor note to clear that up is required. |
2004-03-29
|
03 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-03-26
|
03 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
2004-03-26
|
03 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alex Zinin |
2004-03-26
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Ballot has been issued by Alex Zinin |
2004-03-26
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-03-25
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::External Party by Alex Zinin |
2004-03-25
|
03 | Alex Zinin | No implementations of this spec. The WG would like to change the target status to EXP. |
2004-03-25
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Intended Status has been changed to Experimental from Proposed Standard |
2004-03-25
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 by Alex Zinin |
2003-12-10
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::External Party from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin |
2003-12-10
|
03 | Alex Zinin | waiting for implementation info |
2003-12-10
|
03 | Alex Zinin | [Note]: 'waiting for update AZ: check with chairs' has been cleared by Alex Zinin |
2003-11-14
|
03 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2003-10-31
|
03 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2003-10-31
|
03 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2003-10-30
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Last Call was requested by Alex Zinin |
2003-10-30
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alex Zinin |
2003-10-30
|
03 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2003-10-30
|
03 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2003-10-30
|
03 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-10-22
|
03 | Alex Zinin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alex Zinin |
2003-10-08
|
03 | Dinara Suleymanova | Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Standard |
2003-10-08
|
03 | Dinara Suleymanova | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Dinara Suleymanova |
2003-10-08
|
03 | Dinara Suleymanova | Intended Status has been changed to Standard from Proposed Standard |
2003-10-08
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-02.txt |
2003-06-09
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-01.txt |
2003-03-22
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Taking over after Scott |
2003-03-22
|
03 | Alex Zinin | Shepherding AD has been changed to Zinin, Alex from Bradner, Scott |
2002-10-05
|
03 | Scott Bradner | State Changes to AD Evaluation -- New ID Needed from AD Evaluation -- External Party by sob |
2002-08-15
|
03 | Scott Bradner | 2002-08-15 - nomalize state name |
2002-08-15
|
03 | Scott Bradner | responsible has been changed to Working Group from Scott |
2002-08-15
|
03 | Scott Bradner | State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author) from New Version Coming … State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author) from New Version Coming by sob |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Scott Bradner | 2002-07-29 - comments to WG chairs |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Scott Bradner | A new comment added by sob |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Stephen Coya | State Changes to New Version Coming from Last Call Issued … State Changes to New Version Coming from Last Call Issued by scoya |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Stephen Coya | responsible has been changed to Scott from IETF Secretary |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Stephen Coya | State Changes to Last Call Issued from Last Call … State Changes to Last Call Issued from Last Call Requested by scoya |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Scott Bradner | 2002-07-29 - last call requested |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Scott Bradner | responsible has been changed to IETF Secretary from Scott |
2002-07-29
|
03 | Scott Bradner | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Pre AD Evaluation … State Changes to Last Call Requested from Pre AD Evaluation by sob |
2002-07-23
|
03 | Stephen Coya | Draft Added by scoya |
2002-07-01
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mtu-extensions-00.txt |