Skip to main content

Inter-Area Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Segmented Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast-17

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)

No Record

(Richard Barnes)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.

Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -16) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2015-02-18 for -16) Unknown
For the Global Administrator field, it would be really nice to specify that the IP address needs to be routeable and within what scope (area, AS, inter-AS).  I think the answer is just AS.  This comes up because a recommendation is to use a router's loopback address - and frequently those are deliberately not routeable outside the AS.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2015-02-18 for -16) Unknown
Apologies, I didn't really have time to read and
understand this, but I got triggered by the mention of
"thousands of PEs" in the intro and wonder if we think the
existing security mechanisms referred to in the security
considerations would scale appropriately for such cases.
Am I worrying over nothing or is there maybe a bit more
work (or text) needed to secure such a setup?
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -16) Unknown

                            
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Record
No Record (2015-02-18 for -16) Unknown