Sign in
Version 5.13.0, 2015-03-25
Report a bug

Use of the Synchronization VECtor (SVEC) List for Synchronized Dependent Path Computations

No Objection
(was Discuss)
(was No Record, Discuss)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Summary: Needs a YES.

[Tim Polk]

Comment (2010-04-08 for -05)

Section 4.2 last paragraph, immediately preceding the SVEC-list:
    Why is #Z omitted from the parenthetical?

Section 5.1: if the PCE can't handle the associated SVEC objects it "may
send a PCErr message".  This implies it might construct the paths
anyway.  Is there a mechanism to inform the PCC that the requested
associations were not considered during path construction?