Use of the Synchronization VECtor (SVEC) List for Synchronized Dependent Path Computations
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
( Adrian Farrel ) Yes
Jari Arkko No Objection
( Stewart Bryant ) No Objection
( Gonzalo Camarillo ) No Objection
( Lars Eggert ) No Objection
( Russ Housley ) (was Discuss) No Objection
( Tim Polk ) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2010-04-08 for -05)
Section 4.2 last paragraph, immediately preceding the SVEC-list: Why is #Z omitted from the parenthetical? Section 5.1: if the PCE can't handle the associated SVEC objects it "may send a PCErr message". This implies it might construct the paths anyway. Is there a mechanism to inform the PCC that the requested associations were not considered during path construction?