Ballot for draft-ietf-precis-nickname
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.
Thanks for doing this work!
Yay! Just a few nits: -- Abstract: The abstract could be beefed up against? Maybe say what a nickname is in this context? [Edit: "Against"? I meant "a bit".] -- 1.1, first paragraph: "...participants to specify a nickname ..." Plural agreement mismatch. -- 1.1, 2nd paragraph: People really use "petname" for this? Who knew?
Melinda Shore did the opsdir review.
Thanks for another well-written draft! I just have one question and could be wrong, but in table 1, should the output for #9 have <> around it? <richard iv>