Ballot for draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
I have to say radext drafts are frequently very high quality and this is no exception. Thanks. - 2.1.1.3 - typo: s/PKS/PSK/ - 2.2, just wondering (and not suggesting you change) but did you consider that using san.dNSName with an accompanying policy OID could allow you to use current CA s/w without confusing the semantics (and without requiring the new otherName)? - Thanks for section 6.
Some edits were agreed on during the Gen-ART review; I'm not sure there has a new revision since then.