Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
> The CPE may also require a delegated prefix for its own use, if it is
> decrementing the Time To Live (TTL) field of IP headers. In that
> case, it should be delegated a prefix by the NAS via the Delegated-
> IPv6-Prefix attribute. [RFC4818]. If the CPE is not decrementing
> TTL, it does not require a delegated prefix.
Time To Live is called Hop Limit in IPv6, and since this is
an IPv6 specific Section, perhaps this is the name that you
> inclusion of an Event-Timestampt attribute, for example, then
I am concerned about how this draft seems to break the ability to
negotiate future extensions. In particular the recommendation that
client should treat access-accept with unknown attributes as
access-reject seems problematic. However this issue seems to have
been discussed sufficiently so this is only a comment.
I personally find this text in the last sentence in section 2.1.1 to be unclear:
"neither including an authentication attribute nor a Service-Type attribute"
I suggest rewriting this sentence, deleting the double negative for clarity.