Ballot for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
The following is a rant, and I do not expect any changes based on it (edit: or even a response): The security considerations are of the form of "No new considerations beyond XXX". I have no opinion about the truth of that, but I wish draft authors would, in general, include some supporting discussion when making that sort of assertion.
Russ Housley made some comments in his Gen-ART review, but I do not see a response to him, nor do I see any related changes in -07. Can you check if you need to do anything based on his review comments? Thanks.
options 2-4 in section 5 assume a certain amount of flow or application awareness that option 1 does not, option 1 is about control-plne awarness of topology and it seems reasonable to make that distinction.
What Ben said:-)