Ballot for draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
I support Terry's DISCUSS.
The SecDir reviewer picked up on a stray "/>" in section 6, just making a note of that here, but I'm sure the RFC editor would see it too. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06151.html
Thank you for amending the text in Section 5 (Additional Requirements) to reflect the work in RFC6916 and removing the explicit contradiction. Setting my ballot to No Objection.