Ballot for draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
A small editorial thing in the abstract: This document describes an extension of the Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Internet Data Centre Environments architecture (SIIT-DC), which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are incompatible with IPv6, and/or Network Address Translation to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. With the comma after "IPv6", it looks like you mean this: which allows 1. applications, protocols, or nodes that are incompatible with IPv6 and/or 2. Network Address Translation to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. ...when what you mean is this: which allows applications, protocols, or nodes that are incompatible with 1. IPv6 and/or 2. Network Address Translation to operate correctly in an SIIT-DC environment. I suggest removing the comma.
3.2.1: I don't quite get the last sentence, and it sounds a bit like it might be somewhat hacky - can you explain that some more to me? Thanks.