SPRING Use Cases for Software-defined Networking
draft-kim-spring-use-cases-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Sungsu Kim , Jaewoo Park, EunKyoung Paik , Luis M. Contreras | ||
| Last updated | 2015-01-04 (Latest revision 2014-07-03) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In the Software-Defined Networking (SDN) architecture, an SDN controller establishes flow paths. An SDN controller provides global optimization of paths by controlling all managed switches. However, long flow setup time and failure recovery problems arise due to control overhead of an SDN controller. Segment routing provides source routing function by designating an explicit path. SDN and segment routing can be combined to provide both global optimization and better performance. In this document, we illustrate SDN segment routing use cases of flow setup, failure recovery, Content Distribution Network(CDN), and dual homing.
Authors
Sungsu Kim
Jaewoo Park
EunKyoung Paik
Luis M. Contreras
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)