PCEP Extensions for Tunnel Segment
draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zhenbin Li , Xia Chen | ||
| Last updated | 2017-09-13 (Latest revision 2017-03-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
[I-D.li-spring-tunnel-segment] introduces a new type of segment, Tunnel Segment, for the segment routing. Tunnel segment can be used to reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or provide differentiated services. A binding label can be assigned to tunnel segment. An upstream node can use such a binding label for steering traffic into the appropriate tunnel. This document specifies a set of extensions to PCEP to support that PCC reports binding label of tunnel to PCE and that PCE allocates label for tunnel and updates label binding of tunnel to PCC.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)