Comparison between Segment Routing and LDP/RSVP-TE
draft-li-spring-compare-sr-ldp-rsvpte-01
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Zhenbin Li | ||
Last updated | 2016-09-13 (Latest revision 2016-03-12) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Segment Routing has been proposed to cope with the use cases in traffic engineering, fast re-reroute, service chain, etc. This document is to compare Segment Routing with the existing LDP and RSVP-TE. Through the comparison the challenges are clarified for the Segment Routing when deploy in the existing MPLS network.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)