2.0 Proxy in HTTP/2.0
draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Salvatore Loreto , Robert Skog , Hans Spaak, Dan Druta , Mohammad Hafeez | ||
| Last updated | 2014-04-24 (Latest revision 2013-10-21) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines and clarifies the role of proxies (aka intermediaries) in HTTP 2.0. It aims to assure that HTTP 2.0 contains the same proxy features present in HTTP 1.1. It also defines HTTP 2.0 proxies and advocates the importance and the benefits that they can provide for HTTP 2.0. This document aims to start the discussion within the HTTPBis wg.
Authors
Salvatore Loreto
Robert Skog
Hans Spaak
Dan Druta
Mohammad Hafeez
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)