Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata Interface
draft-ma-cdni-metadata-01
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Kevin J. Ma | ||
| Last updated | 2011-10-31 (Latest revision 2011-10-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ma-cdni-metadata-01
Network Working Group K. Ma
Internet-Draft Azuki Systems, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track October 31, 2011
Expires: May 3, 2012
Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata Interface
draft-ma-cdni-metadata-01
Abstract
Content publishers (CPs) often use multiple Content Delivery Networks
(CDNs) to deliver content to consumers. Though existing interactions
between CPs and individual CDNs are beyond the scope of CDN
interconnection (CDNI), it is important to understand the management
capabilities and features available with existing non-interconnected
multi-CDN deployments. Before migrating to CDNI, CPs must first
assess the suitability of CDNI as a replacement for their existing
non-interconnected multi-CDN deployments. CDN feature configuration
and capability advertisement and enforcement is likely to occur
through the CDNI metadata interface (MI). This document describes an
approach to implementing the CDNI MI through the use of an extensible
metadata model and a light-weight HTTP-based API.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 3, 2012.
Copyright Notice
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2. Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. CDNI Metadata Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.1. Domain Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2. Base Address Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.1. Hierarchical Base Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3. Agent Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4. Metadata Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.4.1. Hierarchical Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3. CDNI Metadata Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.1. Domain API . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.1.1. Domain Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.1.2. Domain Update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.1.3. Domain Retrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.4. Domain Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.1.5. Domain Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2. Agent API . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.1. Agent Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2. Agent Update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.3. Agent Retrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.4. Agent Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.2.5. Agent Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3. Metadata API . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3.1. Metadata Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.3.2. Metadata Update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.3.3. Metadata Retrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.3.4. Metadata Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3.5. Metadata Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.3.6. Metadata Prepositioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4. Metadata Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.1. Origin Server . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
4.2. Activation Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.3. Deactivation Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.4. Administrative Disable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.5. Delegation Disable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.6. Footprint Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.7. HTTP Header Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.8. Protocol Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.9. SSL Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.10. SSL Client Authentication Required . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.11. URL Hash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
1. Introduction
The use cases described in the CDNI use case document
[I-D.ietf-cdni-use-cases] provide motivational use cases for CDN
interconnection (CDNI). They describe reasons and situations where
CDNI provides a benefit to CDN vendors as well as content service
providers (CSPs). Additional use cases exist which describe how CDNs
are used today, however, these use cases often involve specific
features (e.g., customized content transformations, content security,
client authentication and filtering, content acquisition optimization
and redundancy, etc.) which are beyond the scope of CDNI. Though the
features themselves are not relevant to CDNI, the ability to support
those features or enforce policies related to those features in a
generic and extensible manner should be considered when designing
CDNI interfaces. The ability to support feature parity with existing
deployment models (i.e., non-CDNI-based CDN federation) may help to
remove barriers to CDNI adoption.
Though certain interfaces are out of scope of CDNI, e.g.:
o upstream CDN (uCDN) configuration by the CP
o uCDN content acquisition
o uCDN content delivery
o downstream CDN (dCDN) content acquisition
o end user (EU) content acquisition
o third party workflow management
o third party request routing
An awareness of these interfaces and an understanding of the
restrictions which they may impose on CDNI request routing is useful
for understanding the needs of the CDNI metadata interface (MI). As
described in the "Dynamic CDNI Metadata Acquisition Example" section
in the CDNI framework document [I-D.davie-cdni-framework], upon
receiving a request routing interface (RRI) request, the MI MAY be
used to retrieve metadata that is "considered" before responding to
the RRI request. To that end, the MI MUST define a deterministic
method for handling metadata processing. Though the definition and
interpretation of any individual piece of metadata is beyond the
scope of CDNI, a well-defined method for how to respond to a RRI
request when any unknown metadata value is encountered MUST be
supported.
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
This document describes a simple data model for representing CDNI
metadata and a simple protocol for creating and retrieving CDNI
metadata in an opaque manner. The term opaque, in this case, should
be understood to mean: without understanding the underlying meaning
or interpretation of the metadata being represented. The metadata
model and retrieval protocol SHOULD be completely independent of the
definition of individual metadata values. The metadata model and
retrieval protocol MUST also define default behaviors for dealing
with metadata processing errors. The document defines a list of
metadata which are likely applicable to a broad range of CDNI
deployments. The document also provides a separate list of metadata
which are likely to be desirable to content publishers (CPs). This
document is not intended to suggest that any additional interfaces or
requirements are needed beyond those already specified in the CDNI
requirements document [I-D.ietf-cdni-requirements], nor is this
document intended to suggest that any out of scope interfaces or
content publisher feature functionality should be brought into scope.
The metadata examples provided are intended only to illustrate
possible features that interconnected CDNs may wish to support and
the extensibility of the metadata model to handle those situations.
1.1. Terminology
[Ed. insert terminology reference]
1.2. Abbreviations
o CDN: Content Distribution Network
o uCDN: Upstream Content Distribution Network
o dCDN: Downstream Content Distribution Network
o CDNI: Content Distribution Network Interconnection
o CP: Content Publisher
o CSP: Content Service Provider
o EU: End User
o NSP: Network Service Provider
o RRI: Request Routing Interface
o MI: Metadata Interface
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
o CI: Control Interface
2. CDNI Metadata Data Model
The simple data model is shown in Figure 1 below. It includes a top
level Domain object which describes the site(s) to which metadata is
associated. The term site, in this case, should be understood to
mean a collection of related content assets access through a single
portal or Web-site. The Domain is associated with zero or more
opaque Metadata objects. Each Metadata object is associated with one
or more Base Address objects. The Metadata objects are each
associated with a URI within the Domain and accessible through any of
the Base Addresses. A combination of Base Address and URI prefix
matching is used identify Metadata to allow for hierarchical
associations between individual Metadata and sets of content items.
Each Domain is also associated with one or more Agent objects.
Agents represent entities which require access to metadata (e.g.,
CPs, uCDNs, or dCDNs). An Agent is associated with each Metadata
entry allowing different Metadata values to be returned to different
Agents.
+----------+
| | 1
| Agent +---------------+
| | |
+----+-----+ |
| 1..* |
| |
| 1 | 0..*
+----+-----+ +----+-----+ +----------+
| | 1 0..* | | 1 1..* | |
| Domain +----------+ Metadata +----------+ BaseAddr |
| | | | | |
+----+-----+ +----------+ +----------+
Figure 1: CDNI Metadata Data Model
Note: The data model described above is not a strict data model for
specific metadata, it is a data model which contains components
necessary for implementing the CDNI MI. Not all information need be
distributed through the MI. Some information (e.g., Domains and
Agents) may be necessary for the MI to function, but MAY be
negotiated or implemented out-of-band. They could be configured
either by the CDN as part of a non-CDNI process, or through the CDNI
control interface (CI) bootstrapping process, or using the MI APIs
described herein. The MI APIs may also be used by CDNs, internally,
to configure themselves. The complete data model and full set of
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
APIs are provided as part of a holistic MI description.
The following sections describe an example implementation of the
metadata scheme described above using a standard SQL database.
2.1. Domain Table
The Domain object contains basic information related to the site
being described. The example shown contains a primary key index and
a unique name for the site. An OPTIONAL site description (e.g., a
textual description of the site and its content) and site provider
(e.g., the name of the CP or CSP which owns the content) information
is also included.
CREATE TABLE "domain" ("domain_id" serial primary key,
"name" character varying(255) NOT NULL,
"provider" character varying(255),
"description" character varying(4095));
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_domain ON domain (name);
The Domain is the central object for binding Metadata. The example
Domain shown below highlights the descriptive nature of the Domain
object:
domain_id: 1
name: acme
provider: acme rocket-powered products, inc
description: fine purveyors of high quality anvils, rubber bands,
bird seed, and rocket powered footwear
2.2. Base Address Table
The Base Address object contains basic hostname and base URI
information related to the site being accessed. The example shown
requires a primary key index, a string containing the hostname and
base URI, and a foreign key reference to the Metadata to which this
Base Address is associated. A uniqueness constraint is imposed on
baseaddr/metadata_id pairs to prevent duplicate Base Address entries
for a given Metadata.
CREATE TABLE "baseaddr" ("baseaddr_id" serial primary key,
"baseaddr" character varying(255) NOT NULL,
"metadata_id" integer NOT NULL);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_baseaddr ON baseaddr (baseaddr, metadata_id);
Base Address Table Definition
The Base Address objects allows multiple hostname and base URI pairs
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
to be associated with each Metadata object denoting the list of Base
Addresses through which content within the Domain may be accessed.
There are many cases where different Base Addresses are used to
access the same content, e.g.:
o internal vs. external addresses: content may be accessible via
both internal 10-net IP addresses and their associated DNS
addresses and base URIs, as well as publicly routable external IP
addresses and their associated DNS addresses and base URIs, where
all of the addresses point to the same content servers and the
base URIs are mapped to the same base directories,
o service white-labeling: multiple CSPs may provide access to the
same content through different branded services where each branded
service has its own DNS address and/or base URI, but all of the
services point to the same content, or
o analytics partitioning: redirects from other sites may use
different DNS addresses and/or base URIs, so that they may be
easily accounted for, while still pointing at the same content.
The example Base Addresses shown below represent two DNS addresses
through which content may be accessed as well as an internal IP
address which may be used for staging:
baseaddr_id: 1
baseaddr: wile.e.coyote.acme.com
metadata_id: 1
baseaddr_id: 2
baseaddr: road.runner.acme.com
metadata_id: 1
baseaddr_id: 3
baseaddr: 10.10.10.10/meemeep
metadata_id: 1
Note: The exact schema described above may result in heavy
duplication of Base Addresses. It is presented as an example for its
simplicity, however, it may be optimized by using other table joining
scheme implementations.
2.2.1. Hierarchical Base Addresses
In order to support hierarchical Base Addresses, the wildcard '*.'
SHOULD be allowed as the first part of DNS-type Base Addresses. The
wildcard does not make sense at the beginning of IP Address-type Base
Addresses. While a wildcard at the end of IP Address-type Base
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
Addresses would make more sense, support for IP Address-type Base
Addresses is OPTIONAL. The wildcard signifies the applicability of
the associated Metadata value to all Base Addresses which match the
address suffix.
The following two Base Addresses condense the previous example by
allowing all acme.com DNS addresses:
baseaddr_id: 1
baseaddr: *.acme.com
metadata_id: 1
baseaddr_id: 2
baseaddr: 10.10.10.10/meemeep
metadata_id: 1
Note: There is no explicit enforcement that Base Addresses associated
with a given piece of Metadata not overlap, however, for performance
reasons, Base Addresses associated with a given piece of Metadata
SHOULD NOT be allowed to overlap.
2.3. Agent Table
The Agent object contains basic information for authenticating
entities which require access to Metadata. The example shown
contains a primary key index, a string containing the username, an
OPTIONAL string containing the password (possibly hashed or
encrypted), a boolean value for differentiating between full read/
write access (e.g., for uCDNs) and read only access (e.g., for
dCDNs), and a foreign key reference to the Domain to which this Agent
is associated. A uniqueness constraint is imposed on username/
domain_id pairs to prevent duplicate Agent entries for a given
Domain.
CREATE TABLE "agent" ("agent_id" serial primary key,
"username" character varying(255) NOT NULL,
"password" character varying(255),
"read_only" boolean DEFAULT false NOT NULL,
"domain_id" integer NOT NULL);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_agent ON agent (username, domain_id);
Agent Table Definition
Note: The password field is included to support the HTTP
authentication described in the API sections, however, if alternate
authentication schemes are used, the password may not be necessary.
The Agent objects manage Metadata access rights. The Agent
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
functionality as described attempts to address two issues:
o security concerns: where unauthorized injection or deletion of
Metadata may alter the functionality of a content service and MUST
be prevented, as described in the Security Considerations section,
and
o customization requirements: where retrieval of certain metadata
may require different responses depending on the Agent who is
accessing the Metadata.
Note: Though both of the above issues could be addressed though means
outside of the MI, or through a means common to all of the CDNI
interfaces, the Agent serves the purpose of addressing these needs
within the context of the MI, in lieu of a consensus alternative.
The example Agents shown below represent a uCDN Agent with write
privileges and a dCDN Agent with read-only permissions:
agent_id: 1
username: ucdn
password: xxx
read_only: false
domain_id: 1
agent_id: 2
username: dcdn
password: yyy
read_only: true
domain_id: 1
2.4. Metadata Table
The Metadata object contains the actual individual pieces of metadata
for the site being described. The example shown contains a primary
key index, a string containing the URI(s) to which the metadata
applies, a name/value pair of strings which represent the name and
value of the Metadata, respectively, as well as a boolean value
stating whether or not enforcement of the given Metadata is
mandatory. An OPTIONAL ttl value and timeout field are included to
support metadata invalidation. The table also contains a foreign key
reference to the Domain to which this Metadata is associated and a
foreign key reference to the Agent to whom this Metadata is intended.
A compound uniqueness constraint is also applied to each uri/name/
domain_id/agent_id tuple to prevent a given Metadata from being
ambiguously applied multiple times to the same URI in a given Domain
for a given Agent.
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
CREATE TABLE "metadata" ("metadata_id" serial primary key,
"uri" character varying(4095) NOT NULL,
"name" character varying(255) NOT NULL,
"value" character varying(4095) NOT NULL,
"mandatory" boolean DEFAULT false NOT NULL,
"ttl" integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
"timeout" timestamp without time zone,
"domain_id" integer NOT NULL,
"agent_id" integer NOT NULL);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_metadata ON metadata (uri, name,
domain_id, agent_id);
The name/value pair is represented as simple opaque strings. The MI
has no understanding of any inherent meaning for the Metadata names
or values. Metadata names SHOULD be properly defined and registered,
and any implied functionality SHOULD be agreed upon a priori by CDN
operators, however, these negotiations are beyond the scope of CDNI.
The intent of the mandatory boolean is to identify Metadata that MUST
be enforced by all CDNs. If a CDN is unable to understand or is
unable to comply with the Metadata, it MUST NOT deliver the content
being requests. For dCDNs, the mandatory flag defines how to respond
to RRI requests when unknown Metadata is encountered. If Metadata is
marked as mandatory, then the dCDN MUST NOT accept the RRI request if
it does not know how to process that piece of Metadata (e.g., the
named Metadata is not supported, the Metadata value is invalid, or
the Metadata value is not supported). If the MI request resulted
from a "recursive" RRI request, then the dCDN MUST return an error to
the uCDN. If the MI request resulted from an "iterative" RRI
request, then the dCDN MUST respond with a 403 Forbidden status code
to the EU.
The OPTIONAL ttl value is provided to allow configuration of a
Metadata TTLs. The ttl MUST be specified in seconds and the timeout
field SHOULD be populated by the local MI processor and used
internally, to prevent the need for clock synchronization between MI
processors.
The association of each Metadata to an Agent allows different Agents
to retrieve different Metadata values for a given URI in the given
Domain. This is intended to allow CDNs to separate upstream Metadata
from downstream Metadata (e.g., a uCDN content acquisition URL may
point to a CP origin, however, the content acquisition URL that the
dCDN retrieves from the uCDN may point at a surrogate in the uCDN).
Though this information could be hidden within each CDN's
implementation, explicitly representing this in the data model
reduces ambiguity in Metadata retrieval.
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
2.4.1. Hierarchical Metadata
In order to support hierarchical metadata, '/*' SHOULD be allowed as
the last part of the URI hierarchy, signifying the application of
this Metadata value to all URIs which match this URI prefix. If
multiple Metadata are defined with overlapping prefixes, the URI with
the longest prefix match MUST be used. The uniqueness constraint on
the uri/name/domain_id tuple should allow for unambiguous resolution
of Metadata priority.
Given the following three Metadata, the value of the color Metadata
object is defined four times within the same Domain but for different
URIs and Agents:
metadata_id: 1
uri: /*
name: color
value: blue
mandatory: false
ttl: 0
domain_id: 1
agent_id: 2
metadata_id: 1
uri: /*
name: color
value: gold
mandatory: false
ttl: 0
domain_id: 1
agent_id: 1
metadata_id: 2
uri: /grass/*
name: color
value: brown
mandatory: false
ttl: 0
domain_id: 1
agent_id: 2
metadata_id: 3
uri: /grass/on/the/other/side/*
name: color
value: green
mandatory: false
ttl: 0
domain_id: 1
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
agent_id: 2
The default value for the color metadata (signified by the all
encompassing URI "/*") is blue for the dCDN Agent and gold for the CP
Agent. Alternate colors are associated with requests from the dCDN
Agent for URIs that begin with "/grass". By default /grass has a
color of brown, except when requesting "/grass/on/the/other/side/"
which is green.
3. CDNI Metadata Protocol
The Domain, Agent, and Metadata creation/retrieval protocols are
defined in the following sections. All use a simple HTTP-based
approach. The protocol, in general, SHOULD be data format agnostic.
The examples shown herein use an XML representation for MI requests/
responses, however, other well-defined representations (e.g., JSON)
are also acceptable. The protocol shown provides an example of the
functionality required to support the data model described in Section
2, however, any protocol which allows for the creation, modification,
retrieval, and removal of Domains, Agents, and Metadata could also be
acceptable.
It is assumed that a well-known hostname to which MI requests should
be sent is configured through the CDNI bootstrap data. Bootstrap
information is sent through the CDNI CI, as described in the CDNI
requirements document [I-D.ietf-cdni-requirements]. This CDNI MI
bootstrap data corresponds to the MI SEED information described in
the CDNI framework document [I-D.davie-cdni-framework]. The MI APIs
described herein are intended to be serviced by the MI running on
that host. The actual entity which processes the requests is
inconsequential, as long as it has access to the metadata database.
Domain and Agent configurations must exist prior to Metadata
creation/retrieval. Domains and Agents MAY be created as a part of
an off-line business negotiation process or as a part of the CDNI
bootstrapping process. Domains and Agents do not necessarily need to
be created dynamically using the APIs described below, however, the
APIs are included for completeness. When the Domain and Agent APIs
are used, access to the APIs SHOULD be secured using SSL with client
authentication as described in the Security Considerations section.
New content and Metadata MAY be uploaded at any time. The Metadata
API MUST support dynamic creation and modification of Metadata by
valid Agents. Though the Metadata API SHOULD also be secured using
SSL with client authentication as described in the Security
Considerations section (using a different client certificate than
that used for the Domain and Agents APIs), an additional Agent
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
authentication mechanism is REQUIRED to properly filter requests and
results. In the examples shown below, HTTP basic authentication is
used for Agent authentication, though other methods (e.g., HTTP
digest authentication or URL hashing) could also be used.
3.1. Domain API
Domain creation/update is distinguished from domain retrieval by the
HTTP method. Domain creation/update MUST use the POST method.
Domain retrieval MUST use the GET method. Domain removal MUST use
the DELETE method.
All metadata MUST be associated with a Domain. A Domain is created/
modified/retrieved using the "/CDNI/MI/domain" API. The domain API
REQUIRES a single query string argument "domain" which specifies the
name of the Domain to be created/modified/retrieved.
A simple XML representation of the information provided to the domain
creation/update API or returned from the domain retrieval API is
shown below:
<domain>
<provider></provider>
<description></description>
</domain>
3.1.1. Domain Creation
The following example creates a new Domain "acme":
POST /CDNI/MI/domain?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Content-Length: 81
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<domain>
<provider>acme</provider>
<description>acme</description>
</domain>
3.1.2. Domain Update
The following example updates the "acme" Domain:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
POST /CDNI/MI/domain?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Content-Length: 209
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<domain>
<provider>acme rocket-powered products, inc</provider>
<description>fine purveyors of high quality anvils, rubber bands,
bird seed, and rocket powered footwear</description>
</domain>
3.1.3. Domain Retrieval
The following example retrieves the updated "acme" Domain
information:
GET /CDNI/MI/domain?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 209
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/xml
<domain>
<provider>acme rocket-powered products, inc</provider>
<description>fine purveyors of high quality anvils, rubber bands,
bird seed, and rocket powered footwear</description>
</domain>
The MI MAY support bulk retrieval of Domains through the use of a
comma separated list of Domain names in the domain query string
parameter.
3.1.4. Domain Removal
The following example removes the "acme" Domain:
DELETE /CDNI/MI/domain?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
3.1.5. Domain Errors
Any update or retrieval request with malformed XML SHOULD respond
with a 400 Bad Request status code. Ancillary unknown tags MAY be
ignored.
Any update or retrieval request for a Domain which does not exist
SHOULD respond with a 404 Not Found status code.
3.2. Agent API
Agent creation/update is distinguished from Agent retrieval by the
HTTP method. Agent creation/update MUST use the POST method. Agent
retrieval MUST use the GET method. Agent removal MUST use the DELETE
method and specify the Agent name(s) in the query string.
All metadata MUST be associated with an Agent. An Agent is created/
modified/retrieved using the "/CDNI/MI/agent" API. The agent API
REQUIRES a single query string argument "domain" which specifies the
name of the Domain to which the Agent has access. In the case of
DELETEs, the agent API also REQUIRES a query string argument "agent"
which specifies the name(s) of the Agent(s) to remove, as a comma
separated list.
A simple XML representation of the information provided to the agent
creation/update API or returned from the agent retrieval API is shown
below:
<agents>
<agent>
<username></username>
<password></password>
<read_only></read_only>
</agent>
...
</agents>
3.2.1. Agent Creation
The following example creates two new Agents "ucdn" and "dcdn" for
the "acme" Domain:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
POST /CDNI/MI/agent?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Content-Length: 255
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<agents>
<agent>
<username>ucdn</username>
<password>xxx</password>
<read_only>false</read_only>
</agent>
<agent>
<username>dcdn</username>
<password>zzz</password>
<read_only>false</read_only>
</agent>
</agents>
3.2.2. Agent Update
The following example updates the "dcdn" Agent in the "acme" Domain:
POST /CDNI/MI/agent?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Content-Length: 136
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<agents>
<agent>
<username>dcdn</username>
<password>yyy</password>
<read_only>true</read_only>
</agent>
</agents>
3.2.3. Agent Retrieval
The following example retrieves the updated Agent information for the
"acme" Domain:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
GET /CDNI/MI/agent?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 254
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/xml
<agents>
<agent>
<username>ucdn</username>
<password>xxx</password>
<read_only>false</read_only>
</agent>
<agent>
<username>dcdn</username>
<password>yyy</password>
<read_only>true</read_only>
</agent>
</agents>
3.2.4. Agent Removal
The following example removes the "dcdn" Agent from the "acme"
Domain:
DELETE /CDNI/MI/agent?domain=acme&agent=dcdn HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
3.2.5. Agent Errors
Any update or retrieval request with malformed XML SHOULD respond
with a 400 Bad Request status code. Ancillary unknown tags MAY be
ignored.
Any update or retrieval requests for an Agent which does not exist
SHOULD respond with a 404 Not Found status code.
3.3. Metadata API
Metadata creation/update is distinguished from domain retrieval by
the HTTP method. Metadata creation/update MUST use the POST method.
Metadata retrieval MUST use the GET method. Metadata MUST be removed
if the value field is empty (i.e., updating the value to be an empty
string MUST force removal of the entire Metadata entry and all
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
associated Base Address entries).
The Metadata for a Domain is created/modified/retrieved using the
"/CDNI/MI/metadata/" API. The metadata API REQUIRES a single query
string argument "domain" which specifies the name of the Domain to
which the Metadata being created/modified/retrieved belongs. Two
additional OPTIONAL arguments MAY also be provided when retrieving
metadata: "name" which specifies the name of the Metadata field to
create/modify/retrieve, "uri" which specifies a URI for which the
Metadata must apply, and/or "agent" which specifies the agent(s) to
which the Metadata is associated, as a comma separated list. The
"agent" option MUST only be allowed for agents with full read/write
permissions.
A simple XML representation of the information provided to the
metadata creation/update API or returned from the metadata retrieval
API is shown below:
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri></uri>
<name></name>
<value></value>
<mandatory></mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent></agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr></baseaddr>
...
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
...
</metadatas>
3.3.1. Metadata Creation
The following example creates a new default Metadata "origin_server"
for the "dcdn" and "ucdn" Agents in the "acme" Domain, issued by the
"ucdn" Agent:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
POST /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic dWNkbjp4eHg=
Content-Length: 540
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value>edge.ucdn.com</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value>anvil.acme.com</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>ucdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
The following example creates three new Metadata "color" for the
"dcdn" and "ucdn" Agents in the "acme" Domain, issued by the "ucdn"
Agent:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
POST /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic dWNkbjp4eHg=
Content-Length: 789
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>brown</value>
<mandatory>false</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/on/the/other/side/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>green</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/glasses/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>violet</value>
<mandatory>false</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
3.3.2. Metadata Update
The following example updates the "color" Metadata for the
"/glasses/*" portion of the "acme" Domain and "dcdn" Agent, issued by
the "ucdn" Agent:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
POST /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic dWNkbjp4eHg=
Content-Length: 273
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/glasses/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>rose</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
3.3.3. Metadata Retrieval
The following example retrieves the Metadata for the URI "/grass/on/
this/side" in the "acme" Domain. The request was issued by and the
results are filtered for the "dcdn" Agent:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
GET /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme&uri=/grass/on/this/side HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic ZGNkbjp5eXk=
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 530
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/xml
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value>edge.ucdn.com</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>brown</value>
<mandatory>false</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
The following example retrieves all "color" Metadata for the "acme"
Domain. The request was issued by and the results are filtered for
the "dcdn" Agent:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
GET /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme&name=color HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic ZGNkbjp5eXk=
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 786
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/xml
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>brown</value>
<mandatory>false</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/on/the/other/side/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>green</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/glasses/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>rose</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
The following example retrieves all Metadata for the "acme" Domain.
The request was issued by the "ucdn" Agent but includes Metadata for
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
both the "ucdn" and "dcdn" Agents:
GET /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme&agent=ucdn,dcdn HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic dWNkbjp4eHg=
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 1301
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/xml
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value>edge.ucdn.com</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value>anvil.acme.com</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>ucdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>brown</value>
<mandatory>false</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/grass/on/the/other/side/*</uri>
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
<name>color</name>
<value>green</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
<metadata>
<uri>/glasses/*</uri>
<name>color</name>
<value>rose</value>
<mandatory>true</mandatory>
<ttl></ttl>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
<baseaddrs>
<baseaddr>*.acme.com</baseaddr>
</baseaddrs>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
3.3.4. Metadata Removal
The following example removes the default "origin_server" Metadata
for the "dcdn" Agent in the "acme" Domain by setting the value to an
empty string, issued by the "ucdn" Agent:
POST /CDNI/MI/metadata?domain=acme HTTP/1.1
Host: host.mi.cdni.example.com
Accept: */*
Authorization: Basic dWNkbjp4eHg=
Content-Length: 141
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
<metadatas>
<metadata>
<uri>/*</uri>
<name>origin_server</name>
<value/>
<agent>dcdn</agent>
</metadata>
</metadatas>
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
3.3.5. Metadata Errors
For any update or retrieval request with malformed XML, the MI SHOULD
respond with a 400 Bad Request status code. Ancillary unknown tags
MAY be ignored.
For any update or retrieval request for a uri/name/domain_id tuple
which does not exist, the MI SHOULD respond with a 404 Not Found
status code.
For any request which lacks a valid Agent authorization, the MI MUST
respond with a 401 Unauthorized status code. This includes Agents
with valid credentials, but who are marked as read_only and have
requested Metadata associated with an alternate Agent through the
specification of an "agent" query string parameter.
For any request which results in Metadata with an expired TTL, and
for which an update cannot be retrieved from an upstream MI, the MI
MUST respond to with a 500 Internal Server status code.
3.3.6. Metadata Prepositioning
The metadata creation/modification/removal APIs discussed above
SHOULD only be used by uCDNs to preposition metadata in dCDNs. dCDNs
SHOULD NOT modify metadata dictated by the uCDN. dCDNs SHOULD only be
assigned Agents with read_only access and SHOULD NOT have access to
uCDN Domain or Agent APIs (restricted through the use of different
SSL client authentication certificates, as described in the Security
Considerations section).
4. Metadata Definitions
This section defines a base set of Metadata which SHOULD be supported
by all CDNI implementations.
4.1. Origin Server
Content which is not pre-positioned must be acquired by the CDN from
an origin server. The origin server Metadata specifies the base URL
to which the content request URI may be appended in order to acquire
the content. The origin server Metadata is defined as having the
name "origin_server", with valid values containing a comma separated
list of base URLs, and the mandatory flag set to false:
name: origin_server
value: <url>
mandatory: false
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
In some cases, multiple non-load balanced origin servers may be
available for content acquisition. The origin server Metadata SHOULD
support an unprioritized comma separate list of base URL values.
Note: The origin list Metadata is not mandatory, since, if the
content cannot be acquired, there is no threat of unauthorized
content distribution. Other Metadata or content pre-positioning may
negate the need for origin server Metadata.
4.2. Activation Time
Content may be pre-positioned in anticipation of demand, however, the
content license may have restrictions on delivery timeframe. The
activation time Metadata specifies the first time at which the
content may be delivered. The activation time Metadata is defined as
having the name "activation_time", with valid timestamp values that
MUST conform to RFC3339 [RFC3339], and the mandatory flag set to
true:
name: activation_time
value: <timestamp>
mandatory: true
If the activation time Metadata is set and the current time is less
than the specified activation time, the CDN MUST respond to requests
for that content with a 403 Forbidden status code (or equivalent for
the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.3. Deactivation Time
Content may be pre-positioned in anticipation of demand, however, the
content license may have restrictions on delivery timeframe. The
deactivation time Metadata specifies the last time at which the
content may be delivered. The deactivation time Metadata is defined
as having the name "deactivation_time", with valid timestamp values
that MUST conform to RFC3339 [RFC3339], and the mandatory flag set to
true:
name: deactivation_time
value: <timestamp>
mandatory: true
If the deactivation time Metadata is set and the current time is
greater than the specified activation time, the CDN MUST respond to
requests for that content with a 403 Forbidden status code (or
equivalent for the given non-HTTP request protocol).
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
4.4. Administrative Disable
It is sometimes necessary to temporarily disable the distribution of
certain media (e.g., inappropriate content, irregular access
patterns, etc.) within a set accessibility period (i.e., the
activation/deactivation time range). The administrative disable
Metadata instructs the CDN not to deliver the specified content under
any circumstances. The administrative disable Metadata is defined as
having the name "admin_disable", with two valid values "true" and
"false", and the mandatory flag set to true:
name: admin_disable
value: [true | false]
mandatory: true
If the administrative disable Metadata is set to "true", the CDN MUST
respond to requests for that content with a 403 Forbidden status code
(or equivalent for the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.5. Delegation Disable
CSPs may wish to prevent cascading CDNs to enforce licensing
restrictions. The delegation disable Metadata instructs the CDN not
to delegate requests for the specified content to any dCDNs under any
circumstances. The delegation disable Metadata is defined as having
the name "delegate_disable", with two valid values "true" and
"false", and the mandatory flag set to true:
name: delegate_disable
value: [true | false]
mandatory: true
If the delegation disable Metadata is set to "true", the CDN MUST
either service the content requests itself or respond to requests for
that content with a 504 Server Busy status code (or equivalent for
the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.6. Footprint Filter
CSPs often purchase rights to content which are only valid when
accessed from certain locations (e.g., within a given country or
through a given access network). The footprint filter Metadata
provides a list of valid source IP subnets from which content
requests may be accepted. The footprint filter Metadata is defined
as having the name "footprint", with valid values containing a comma
separated list of IP subnet definitions, and the mandatory flag set
to true:
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
name: footprint
value: <ip_subnet> [, <ip_subnet>]...
mandatory: true
If the footprint filter Metadata is set and the source address of a
requesting client does not match any of the IP subnets listed, the
CDN MUST respond to the content request with a 403 Forbidden status
code (or equivalent for the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.7. HTTP Header Filter
CSPs often desire the ability to filter requests based on the
existence of specific HTTP header fields and values (e.g., User-Agent
headers for device detection or custom headers inserted by client-
side applications). The HTTP header filter Metadata provides a list
of HTTP header names and values which must be verified. The HTTP
header filter Metadata is defined as having the name "http_headers",
with valid values containing a comma separated list of HTTP header
names and regular expression matching criteria definitions, and the
mandatory flag set to true:
name: http_headers
value: <name>:<regex> [, <name>:<regex>]...
mandatory: true
If the HTTP header filter Metadata is set and the HTTP headers of the
content request do not match all of the filters specified, the CDN
MUST respond to the content request with a 403 Forbidden status code
(or equivalent for the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.8. Protocol Filter
Though content is typically only accessible using specific a protocol
(e.g., HTTP, RTMP, or RTSP), a CSP may wish to explicitly allow/
disallow access to certain content for a given protocol. The
protocol filter Metadata provides a list of allowed protocols via
which content may be delivered. The protocol filter Metadata is
defined as having the name "protocol", with valid values containing a
comma separate list of protocol strings, and the mandatory flag set
to true:
name: protocols
value: <protocol> [, <protocol>]...
mandatory: true
If the protocol filter Metadata is set and the request protocol does
not match any protocol in the list, the CDN MUST respond to the
content request with a 403 Forbidden status code (or equivalent for
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
the given non-HTTP request protocol).
4.9. SSL Required
CSPs which require delivery privacy may require dCDNs to support the
same SSL configurations which were applied to the uCDN. The SSL
required Metadata expresses the requirement to enforce SSL on content
request connections and provides the necessary key and certificate
information required for server authentication. The SSL required
Metadata is defined as having the name "ssl_required", with valid
values containing two URLs (comma separated) which point to the key
and certificate, respectively, and the mandatory flag set to true:
name: ssl_required
value: <key_url>,<cert_url>
mandatory: true
If the SSL required Metadata is set and the request is not received
over an SSL channel, the CDN MUST respond to the content request with
a 403 Forbidden status code (or equivalent for the given non-HTTP
request protocol).
Note: Retrieval of server key and certificate information SHOULD be
performed in a secure manner. Retrieval could be implemented through
the CDNI MI, however, this is not required.
4.10. SSL Client Authentication Required
CSPs which require client authentication may require dCDNs to support
a SSL client authentication configuration which was applied to the
uCDN. The SSL client authentication required Metadata expresses the
requirement to enforce SSL client authentication on content requests
and provides the necessary certificate authority (CA) information for
authenticating clients. The SSL client authentication required
Metadata is defined as having the name "ssl_auth_required", with
valid values containing a single URL which points to the CA
certificate to be used in client verification, and the mandatory flag
set to true:
name: ssl_auth_required
value: <ca_url>
mandatory: true
If the SSL client authentication required Metadata is set and the
client certificate cannot be verified using the CA certificate, the
CDN MUST respond with a handshake_failure alert.
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
4.11. URL Hash
TBD.
[Ed. Note: There are many proprietary URL hashing techniques in use
today with varying timestamp formats, query string parameter names,
hashing algorithm combinations, etc. A generic definition of URL
hashing algorithm parameters, capable of supporting all algorithms
would be best.]
5. IANA Considerations
This memo includes no request to IANA.
6. Security Considerations
There are a number of security concerns associated with the MI as
Metadata may be used to influence CDNI request routing. Metadata may
describe content acquisition parameters or content security
restrictions. Altering Metadata or inhibiting Metadata discovery may
impact content distribution. Some MI concerns include:
o intercepting and discarding Metadata requests to prevent content
acquisition may be used as a denial of service attack,
o altering content acquisition Metadata to prevent content
acquisition may be used as a denial of service attack, and
o spoofing content security Metadata to disable delivery
restrictions may be used to circumvent rights management.
To combat these concerns, unauthorized access to the MI MUST be
prevented. The use of SSL with client authentication SHOULD be used
for all MI APIs. Deployments in controlled environments where
physical security and IP address white-listing is employed MAY choose
not to use SSL. Different client authentication certificates SHOULD
be used to protect access to Domain and Agent APIs, as well as uCDN
access to the Metadata API, differently from dCDN access to the
Metadata API. Deployments where uCDNs and dCDNs are mutually trusted
entities (e.g., when uCDNs and dCDNs are controlled by the same
corporate organization) MAY choose to use a single client
authentication certificate.
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft CDNI Metadata October 2011
7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Daniel Biagini and the CDNI WG
community for their helpful reviews and comments.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002.
8.2. Informative References
[I-D.davie-cdni-framework]
Davie, B., Ed. and L. Peterson, Ed., "Framework for CDN
Interconnection draft-davie-cdni-framework-00", July 2011.
[I-D.ietf-cdni-requirements]
Leung, K. and Y. Lee, "Content Distribution Network
Interconnection (CDNI) Requirements
draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-01", October 2011.
[I-D.ietf-cdni-use-cases]
Bertrand, G., Stephan, E., Watson, G., Burbridge, T.,
Eardley, P., and K. Ma, "Use Cases for Content Delivery
Network Interconnection draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-00",
September 2011.
Author's Address
Kevin J. Ma
Azuki Systems, Inc.
43 Nagog Park
Acton, MA 01720
USA
Phone: +1 978-844-5100
Email: kevin.ma@azukisystems.com
Ma Expires May 3, 2012 [Page 33]