Skip to main content

Alternatives for Multilevel TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
draft-perlman-trill-rbridge-multilevel-05

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
Expired & archived
Authors Radia Perlman , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd , Anoop Ghanwani , Hongjun Zhai
Last updated 2013-06-08 (Latest revision 2012-12-05)
Replaced by draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel, RFC 8243
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This is an informational document describing issues and comparing general advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to extending TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lot of Links) to use multilevel IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) routing to improve TRILL's scalability.

Authors

Radia Perlman
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Anoop Ghanwani
Hongjun Zhai

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)