datatracker.ietf.org
Sign In
Version 4.45, 2013-05-14
Report a bug

Multiple Repository Publication Points support in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
draft-rogaglia-sidr-multiple-publication-points-02

Active Internet-Draft (candidate for sidr WG)
Document Stream: IETF
Last updated: 2013-02-25
Intended RFC status: (None)
Other versions: plain text, pdf, html

IETF State: Call For Adoption By WG Issued (sidr)
Document shepherd:(None)
Shepherd writeup
Consensus:Unknown

IESG State: I-D Exists
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

Network Working Group                                        R. Gagliano
Internet-Draft                                             Cisco Systems
Updates: RFC 6490 (if approved)                             T. Manderson
Intended status: Standards Track                                   ICANN
Expires: August 29, 2013                                     C. Martinez
                                                                  LACNIC
                                                       February 25, 2013

 Multiple Repository Publication Points support in the Resource Public
                       Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
           draft-rogaglia-sidr-multiple-publication-points-02

Abstract

   The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) depends on Relying
   Parties (RP) ability to access its Trust Anchors' certificate
   specified in the different "Trust Anchor Locator (TAL)" files and the
   Repository Objects located at the Certificate Authorities (CA)
   repositories hosted in its respective publication point.  This
   document updates [RFC6490] by allowing multiple URI associated to a
   single public key in a TAL file and introduces the concept of
   multiple repository publication point operators for every CA in the
   RPKI.  This document provides also recommendation for the RP behavior
   when analyzing signed objects that include multiple publications
   points.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 29, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Gagliano, et al.         Expires August 29, 2013                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           RPKI Multiple Operators           February 2013

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Requirements notation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Multiple Operators support in TAL files  . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.1.  Update to RFC 6490 Section 2.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.2.  Rules for Relying Parties (RP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   4.  Multiple Operators support in Certificates . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.1.  Rules for Relying Parties (RP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   5.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   7.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   8.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Gagliano, et al.         Expires August 29, 2013                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft           RPKI Multiple Operators           February 2013

1.  Requirements notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

Gagliano, et al.         Expires August 29, 2013                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft           RPKI Multiple Operators           February 2013

2.  Introduction

   The RPKI repository system described in [RFC6481] requires
   scalability and diversity in order to address challenges such as
   Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, to secure the