IETF Working Groups' Secretaries
draft-secretaries-good-practices-07

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Barry Leiba)

No Record

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Mahesh Jethanandani
Murray Kucherawy
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Warren Kumari
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke

Summary: Needs a YES.

Deb Cooley
No Record
Erik Kline
No Record
Francesca Palombini
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Jim Guichard
No Record
John Scudder
No Record
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Murray Kucherawy
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Paul Wouters
No Record
Roman Danyliw
No Record
Warren Kumari
No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Record
Éric Vyncke
No Record
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
                    

                        

                            Barry Leiba Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2014-12-03)
                                
                                
                                    
                                    
                                         Unknown
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Two very minor comments:

1. I would like to see RFC 2418 as a normative reference.  That's not because it initially defines the job of the working group secretary, but because it defines how working groups operate in general, and I think it's therefore critical to understand that in order to put the delegation to a secretary into proper perspective.

2. In Section 5 you say this:

   Section 3 has listed the typical functions and responsibilities of WG
   Secretaries. The role of a given WG Secretary can range from a few of
   these to the full spectrum of them, and even beyond.

I don't think "typical" is really the right word here: do you know of any working group that delegates all of those things to the secretary?  I think those are typical WG chair functions and responsibilities, but not (at least not yet) typical secretary functions.  It might be that "possible" is better?  Or perhaps "...listed the typical functions and responsibilities of WG Chairs that might be delegated to a WG Secretary."