Multihoming support for Residential Gateway (RG) using IP mobility protocols
draft-seite-dmm-bonding-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Pierrick Seite | ||
| Last updated | 2015-01-04 (Latest revision 2014-07-03) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The Quality of Experience of fixed network user can be improved with multiple WAN interfaces Residential Gateway (RG), i.e. RG supporting more than one WAN interface (e.g. LTE and DSL), so that it can take benefit of multihoming advantages. This document discusses the use of IP mobility protocols (NEMO [RFC3753] and Mobile IPv6 [RFC6275]), and their Multiple care-of-address extension [RFC5648], to meet multihomed RG requirements. This document also defines a new mobility option, the bonding option, for IP mobility protocols. This option is used by the mobility entities to configure the interface bonding where packets, of a given IP flow, are distributed.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)