S-PE Outage Protection for Static Multi-Segment Pseudowires
draft-shawam-pwe3-ms-pw-protection-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew G. Malis , Loa Andersson , Huub van Helvoort , Jongyoon Shin , Lei Wang , Alessandro D'Alessandro | ||
| Last updated | 2014-10-10 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In MPLS and MPLS-TP environments, statically provisioned Single- Segment Pseudowires (SS-PWs) are protected against tunnel failure via MPLS-level and MPLS-TP-level tunnel protection. With statically provisioned Multi-Segment Pseudowires (MS-PWs), each segment of the MS-PW is likewise protected from tunnel failures via MPLS-level and MPLS-TP-level tunnel protection. However, static MS-PWs are not protected end-to-end against failure of one of the switching PEs (S-PEs) along the path of the MS-PW. This document describes how to achieve this protection by updating the existing procedures in RFC 6870. It also contains an optional approach based on MPLS-TP Linear Protection.
Authors
Andrew G. Malis
Loa Andersson
Huub van Helvoort
Jongyoon Shin
Lei Wang
Alessandro D'Alessandro
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)