A comparison between the DHCPv6 and RA based host configuration
draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Andrew Yourtchenko | ||
| Last updated | 2014-05-31 (Latest revision 2013-11-27) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document attempts to make a balanced comparison between the RA- based and DHCPv6-based host configuration mechanisms. It compares the two on different aspects, e.g: underlying media assumptions, coordination, locality, etc. and highlights the strong and weak sides of both protocols for each scenario.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)