datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

IP Authentication Header
RFC 4302

Discuss
Yes
No Objection
(was Discuss)
(was Discuss, Yes)
(was No Record, No Objection)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 10 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.

[Harald Alvestrand]

Comment (2005-01-06)

Reviewed by Elwyn Davies, Gen-ART

Review in document comments; they seem as if they would have made the document
better if addressed, but this has already been around the bush once. Not worth
holding it for these.

[Jon Peterson]

Comment (2003-10-02)

If mandatory-to-implement algorithms have been moved out of 2402bis into a
separate RFC (per Section 7 and the 2nd paragraph of Section 5), it might be
nice to have a normative reference to that separate RFC in 2402bis.

[Margaret Wasserman]

Comment (2003-10-02)

There is a normative reference to the IPv6 specification (presumably
because this document references the IPv6 header fields), but there
is no normative reference to IPv4.  I think that there should be.

[Sam Hartman]

Comment (2005-01-06)

The security considerations section is weak.  Ideally it would be
better.  However I cannot think of things that need to be added that
would affect what people do in practice.

[Steven Bellovin]

Discuss (2003-10-02)

Section 6 can't be evaluated until 2401bis shows up.