Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Has enough positions to pass.
Gen-ART review comments from Mary Barnes:
Security Considerations section is inadequate. It mentions that other
pwe3 documents would address the security considerations, but there are
no specific references, nor even a basic description of the threats
associated with the scenarios under which this protocol is used.
(similar comment as raised by Ted and Russ).
- Abstract. First sentence is grammatically incorrect. I would suggest
adding either "defines", "specifies" or
"describes" prior to "how" in that sentence.
- General. First use of acronyms should be expanded, even though they're
listed in the glossary (e.g. SLI in section 1, etc.).
- Section 3. Second/last sentence. Would read better by changing from:
" This includes what will happen when an ATM Circuit
(e.g. AAL5 PVC) is created, deleted or changes state when circuit is
"This includes what will happen when an ATM Circuit
(e.g. AAL5 PVC) is created, deleted or changes state when circuit
[At least I think the statement is referring to the circuit being in a
stat of ALARM.]
The 2nd paragraph of the Introduction begins:
> Any ATM specific AVPs or other L2TP constructs for ATM pseudo-wire
> (ATMPW) support will be defined here as well.
This document is right: it is incomprehensible without a deeper
understanding of the L2TP spec than I have. While I'm not going to
block it on that point, I cannot evaluate well enough to enter a no