Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Has enough positions to pass.
From Gen-ART review by Pasi Eronen:
There is one minor nit (but IANA/RFC editor will take care of it):
sections 9.3 and 9.4 suggest the same value (198) forthe
SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE and SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE objects.
When recommending the use of IPsec, please point to section 12
Extended Tunnel ID
A 32-bit (or 16-byte) identifier used in the SESSION that
remains constant over the life of the tunnel. Normally set to
all zeros. Ingress nodes that wish to narrow the scope of a
SESSION to the ingress-egress pair MAY place their IPv4 (or
IPv6) address here as a globally unique identifier.
I think it would be better to say 32-bit or 128-bit identifer; this is
more consistent, avoids the "byte is not always octet" gotcha, and seems
closer to the typical usage for v6 address discussions.