IANA Considerations for OSPF
RFC 4940

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

( Bill Fenner ) Yes

( David Kessens ) Yes

Jari Arkko (was Discuss) No Objection

( Ross Callon ) No Objection

( Brian Carpenter ) No Objection

Comment (2006-08-29 for -)
In the Introduction I find:
   A range of values MAY be reserved for Experimentation as set out in
   [9].  Values from this range MUST NOT be assigned by IANA. 

I find that MAY confusing. Later in the document some experimental ranges are defined. Who does the MAY apply to? Does this actually mean:

   For some paramters, a range of values is reserved for Experimentation
   as set out in [9]. 

(still awaiting my Gen-ART review)

( Lisa Dusseault ) No Objection

( Lars Eggert ) No Objection

( Ted Hardie ) No Objection

( Sam Hartman ) No Objection

( Russ Housley ) (was Discuss) No Objection

( Cullen Jennings ) No Objection

Comment (2006-08-30 for -)
Seems like this should be a PS that updates the OSPF RFC not an BCP. 

The IANA consideration section is not good :-)

( Jon Peterson ) No Objection

( Dan Romascanu ) No Objection

( Mark Townsley ) (was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

( Magnus Westerlund ) No Objection