IANA Considerations for OSPF
RFC 4940

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Bill Fenner) Yes

(David Kessens) Yes

Jari Arkko (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Brian Carpenter) No Objection

Comment (2006-08-29 for -)
In the Introduction I find:
   A range of values MAY be reserved for Experimentation as set out in
   [9].  Values from this range MUST NOT be assigned by IANA. 

I find that MAY confusing. Later in the document some experimental ranges are defined. Who does the MAY apply to? Does this actually mean:

   For some paramters, a range of values is reserved for Experimentation
   as set out in [9]. 

(still awaiting my Gen-ART review)

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Ted Hardie) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

Comment (2006-08-30 for -)
Seems like this should be a PS that updates the OSPF RFC not an BCP. 

The IANA consideration section is not good :-)

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) (was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund) No Objection