Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 8 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
I support Lars' DISCUSS.
Abstracts should not contain references.
Please consider the Gen-ART Review comments from Brian Carpenter:
As a newcomer to the topic, I found the guidance on when to choose the
Info-Package mechanism and when to choose an alternative (Section 7) a
little weak. I didn't get a strong sense of when it would be clearly
idiotic to choose Info-Package (except for bulk data transfer). Maybe
an Informational document on this would be helpful. Otherwise, the
mechanism seems at some risk of becoming a catch-all for proprietary
I support Lars' DISCUSS position.
Sec 6.1: Define "Mandatory". If its meaning is taken from RFC 3291 add
something like "Mandatory (as defined in RFC3261) ...."