URI Scheme for Java(tm) Message Service 1.0
RFC 6167

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

( Alexey Melnikov ) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

( Ron Bonica ) No Objection

( Stewart Bryant ) No Objection

( Gonzalo Camarillo ) No Objection

( Lars Eggert ) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4:
>    The syntax of this 'jms' URI is not compatible with any known current
>    vendor implementation, but the expressivity of the format should
>    permit all vendors to use it.

  So are there vendor implementations of 'jms' already? If yes, what it
  the value in publishing a specification that is not compatible with
  any of them? Or do we have an indication that the vendors will adopt
  this spec?

( Adrian Farrel ) No Objection

( Russ Housley ) No Objection

( Dan Romascanu ) No Objection

( Peter Saint-Andre ) No Objection

( Robert Sparks ) No Objection

( spt ) No Objection