URI Scheme for Java(tm) Message Service 1.0
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
(Alexey Melnikov) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4: > The syntax of this 'jms' URI is not compatible with any known current > vendor implementation, but the expressivity of the format should > permit all vendors to use it. So are there vendor implementations of 'jms' already? If yes, what it the value in publishing a specification that is not compatible with any of them? Or do we have an indication that the vendors will adopt this spec?