Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling
RFC 6624

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

Comment (2012-01-15 for -)
Nice documemnt, well positioned as complementary to the official IETF
approach. Thanks.

---

"PE" first appears in Section 1.1 without expansion.

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

Stephen Farrell No Objection

Comment (2012-01-19 for -09)
A check that acronymns are expanded on 1st use would be good,
e.g. DLCI was the one I noticed.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2012-01-18 for -)
  One non-blocking comment from the Gen-ART Review by Roni Even on
  7-Sep-2011 has not been resolved.  Please consider it:
  >
  > Section 4.2 refers to section 4 but I am not sure where this
  > mechanism in section 4 is.

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(spt) No Objection

Comment (2012-01-18 for -)
Where do the L2VPN TLVs go in the VPLS NLRI?  Does the TLV(s) appear immediately after the VPKS NRLI when sent between the two PEs?