Liaison statement
Response to COM16 - LS 190 on "IDN related standardization"

State Posted
Posted Date 2011-02-23
From Group IETF
From Contact Patrik Fältström
To Group ITU-T-SG-16
To Contacts
Purpose For information
Attachments (None)
Liaisons referring to this one Reply LS to IETF on IDN-related standardization (IETF LS 1019)
This is a response to liaison COM 16 – LS 190 – E, "LS to IETF, IAB, ICANN,
W3C, ISO TC 2, Unicode Consortium on IDN related standardization".

IETF has during fall of 2010 released a number of RFCs related to the topic.
For example the following:

5890 Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA):
Definitions and Document Framework. J. Klensin. August 2010. (Format:
TXT=54245 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC3490) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)

5891 Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol.
J. Klensin. August 2010. (Format: TXT=38105 bytes) (Obsoletes
RFC3490, RFC3491) (Updates RFC3492) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)

5892 The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA). P. Faltstrom, Ed.. August 2010. (Format:
TXT=187370 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)

5893 Right-to-Left Scripts for Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA). H. Alvestrand, Ed., C. Karp. August 2010.
(Format: TXT=38870 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)

5894 Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA):
Background, Explanation, and Rationale. J. Klensin. August 2010.
(Format: TXT=115174 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)

5895 Mapping Characters for Internationalized Domain Names in
Applications (IDNA) 2008. P. Resnick, P. Hoffman. September 2010.
(Format: TXT=16556 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL)

IETF is collaborating with Unicode Consortium that have also released and
updated a number of documents on the topic. For example Unicode Technical
Standard #46, "Unicode IDNA Compatibilty Processing" [UTS46], Unicode
Technical Report #36, "Unicode Security Considerations" [UTR36] and Unicode
Technical Standard #39, "Unicode Security Mechanisms" [UTS39].

IETF is also working with ICANN and their programme related to IDN
( which include rules and recommendations
for confusability that have implications on what domain names to register.

To conclude, IETF see a large risk overlap between what this initiative in the
ITU-T is related to and work done in other SDOs. Because of this, without any
clear explicit charter for the work that clearly identify work items that
other SODs are not doing, we must recommend ITU-T to not take up this as a new
work item in SG16.