Skip to main content

Liaison statement
LS out Reply to "Reply LS to 3GPP TSG CT4 on support of ECN"

Additional information about IETF liaison relationships is available on the IETF webpage and the Internet Architecture Board liaison webpage.
State Posted
Submitted Date 2011-03-17
From Group 3GPP
From Contact Susanna Kooistra
To Group IETF
To Contacts gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
Cc iesg@ietf.org
Response Contact hannu.hietalahti@nokia.com
Purpose For information
Attachments Change request
Body
3GPP TSG CT4 Meeting #52        C4-111025
Salt Lake City, US
21st  – 25th February 2011

Title:  LS out Reply to "Reply LS to 3GPP TSG CT4 on support of ECN"
Response to:    LS (C4-110519, COM 16 – LS 203 – E) on Reply LS to 3GPP TSG CT4
on support of ECN from ITU-T Q3/16 Release:        Rel-10 Work Item:     
ECSRA_LAA-CN

Source: 3GPP TSG CT4
To:     ITU-T Q3/16
Cc:     TSG CT, IETF AVTCORE

Contact Person:
Name:   Phil Hodges
Tel. Number:    +61 404069546
E-mail Address: Philip . hodges @ Ericsson . com

Attachments:    C4-111026

1. Overall Description:
CT4 thanks ITU-T Q3/16 for their reply liaison regarding Explicit Congestion
Notification support in H.248 and is pleased to read that a new WI has been
initiated to develop a solution that can be used by 3GPP.

CT4 has agreed a stage 3 solution which aims to satisfy the requirements in
3GPP Rel-10 but it is envisaged that some additional work will be required to
support interworking to non-3GPP ECN networks.

The attached CR includes the stage 3 solution embodied in two packages
described in Annexes. CT4 is aware that the CR contains a number of errors
which will be corrected in a later revision. The CR was agreed by majority in
order to progress the work but it was not agreed by consensus as it was
questioned whether the solution should be a single H.248 package or as
proposed: a generic package and an additional 3GPP specific package. What is
agreed by consensus is that a single ECN solution (whether it consists of
multiple packages or not) is desired by 3GPP. Hence despite proposing the
second package as a 3GPP package CT4 prefer this being part of a generic ITU-T
solution.

CT4 asks ITU-T Q3/16 if the solution described in 3GPP Annexes can be developed
as a single generic solution, i.e. if the scenarios required by 3GPP can be
solved by the generic package(s) and still support all other scenarios.

2. Actions:
To ITU-T Q3/16 group.
ACTION:         CT4 kindly asks ITU-T Q3/16 to consider the CT4 agreed stage 3
solution as input to their generic work on H.248.ECN, consider the above
question and provide CT4 with any output drafts on this work from Q3/16.

3. Date of Next CT4 Meetings:

CT4#53  9th – 13th May 2011             Tallinn, Estonia
CT4#54  22nd – 26th August 2011         Malta