• Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG
  • Awaiting Expert Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting External Review/Resolution of Issues Raised
  • Awaiting Merge with Other Document
  • Author or Editor Needed
  • Waiting for Referenced Document
  • Waiting for Referencing Document
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by AD
  • Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG
  • Doc Shepherd Follow-up Underway
  • Other - see Comment Log

IETF :: alto

Current state: WG Document

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.

2012-09-30 00:23 (System)

RFC published

2012-07-10 09:44 Cindy Morgan

State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent

2012-07-09 13:10 (System)

IANA Action state changed to No IC

2012-07-09 09:36 Cindy Morgan

State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent

2012-07-09 09:36 Cindy Morgan

IESG has approved the document

2012-07-09 09:36 Cindy Morgan

Closed "Approve" ballot

2012-07-09 09:35 Cindy Morgan

Ballot approval text was generated

2012-07-09 09:06 Wesley Eddy

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

2012-07-09 01:54 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concern.

2012-07-09 01:54 Stewart Bryant

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-06-22 04:55 Pete Resnick

[Ballot comment]
Please review Ted Hardie's comments in his Apps Directorate review and address as appropriate.

2012-06-22 04:55 Pete Resnick

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-06-20 02:46 Benoit Claise

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-06-15 03:03 Sebastian Kiesel

New revision available

2012-05-29 14:11 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot comment]

I'm (still:-) a bit confused by what might be a conflict
between sections 3.3 and 5.2. The former says that
nothing is mandatory-to-use, but the latter says
that "neither the ALTO server nor a third party
using or misusing the ALTO service should be able to
infer the application behavior, e.g., who is
exchanging which files with whom using a P2P file
sharing application." I can't see how the latter can
be guaranteed if the former is true.

2012-05-29 14:11 Stephen Farrell

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-05-29 08:54 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss and Comments

2012-05-29 08:54 Adrian Farrel

[Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss

2012-05-29 06:32 (System)

Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed

2012-05-29 06:32 Sebastian Kiesel

New revision available

Viewing the last 20 entries. Show full log.